Yeah, but allow Russia with have best SPAA already to do thing that brimstone aren’t this is double standard on display if you ask me
if Brimstone gonna stuck with SAL the best thing they should do is let KH-38 slinger stuck with SAL version of KH-38 not add MT that can be very least but still not stop gaijin, aren’t it?
This is getting off topic but
114L is also mmW, 120C-5 is not needed when 120A/B can still compete at the current meta, M829A2 is already the 2nd highest penning round in top tier
And the only higher penning round is german.
Again, veering on the off topic. Pantsir is only best, because no other nation decided to make a similar system because they stepped away from the mobile SPAA concept
This makes sense irl, not so much in a video game
which create a problem because then pantsir would dominate forever and leave other nations in scramble
and yes off topic
kh-38mt should be remove
mmW or IR+IOG it still FnF yet one allows to have FnF because they using IR while other not allow to have FnF because they use different seeker?
consider western SPAA is jet sure that better missile can compensates what they luck ground SPAA just fine sure you have pantsir for defense ground against incoming AGM and bomb because west don’t bother have with SPAA like that but west using jet with better missile
and actually, they do have good SPAA that on par if not better than Pantsir IRIS-T SLM for example.
But it does not dominate. CAS has been dominant way before the introduction of the Kh-38
IRIS-T is not a Pantsir equivalent, it’s a Buk equivalent.
Also as I said before. You still technically beat IR with smoke, mmW does not
and now its even more dominant and more on the side that actually has competence spaa
your thread name was very good imo
unless we know they really used the same technology we cant nerf a completely different missile on the basis of another, Russia stole the tech from the aim9b to create the r3s
but still manged to create much better r60 and r73 missiles later
Wait I must have been tired when I first saw this. But it says the 65mt is an On-board computing platform not a seeker.
The seeker inside does appear to be the same so possibly both are 305M seekers and it’s just a change of the nose cone?
3038 posts and absolutely ZERO concrete proof that the missile known as KH-38MT is actually real
Its impossible to achieve 3rd gen IR imaging without significant cooling.
You must sacrifice refresh rate, resolution or “colour” bandwidth significantly.
Edit:
As an FYI, pretty much all thermal imaging sensors are cooled in some way or another, even off the shelf civilian use ones which use TEC cooling, which any proposed sensor on the KH-38MT would have to use.
i believe kh38mt could be real but mostly classified irl.
however thats not the point, theres not enough proof for it to be in game and should be removed and replaced.
my opinion is to replace it with kh29td and buff its seeker with IR and zoom and quality as i believe its just a agm65b seeker.
also give some tgb on su34.
if gaijin has proof and shows us (highly unlikely) they can keep it in game, but otherwise, what i proposed could be a good idea.
Appreciate the input and suggestion provide o7
Sorry, tgb? I don’t know that acronym
What makes you so sure it’s 3rd generation?
Thermal imager of the T-90M tank does not require cooling
gaijin model it gen 3 ingame and they quote “it was incorrect” in the datamine