justice for game balance would be removing cas completely from ground battles and giving fully capable air-ground weaponry to planes
3 Likes
I think the top of “lense” might be a reflection from some railing in front of it
you can clearly see the edge of the circuit board through it
additionally how the wires are run suggests that the seeker is looking up as they would offer more range of motion if that was the case
finally the orientation of the visible circuitry doesnt make much sense if it is in IIR lense at the bottom as its position and angle would suggest an axis of rotation very recessed into the missile which would significantly lower seeker FOV
No the top is most definitely a pivot area. You can tell by the marker on it.
I agree. Many are missing from many aircraft. Gaijins reluctance to add GBU options is weird. Typhoon is missing nearly a dozen options across all nations
X-38 should be removed not because they didn’t exist in real life, but because they broke the balance of the game.
AASM also needs to be removed
yes, i know
If what you are saying is true…
…Although there isn’t a single picture of it, and the fact that it doesn’t exists Gaijin wont say or do anything about it but if this was america or UK or Germany it would be stripped out the game at first thought.
2 Likes
AASM might be about to get a massive nerf as its looking less and less like it was usable against tanks and other moving targets. Meaning the only really usable version for GRB is the laser guided variant
It was exactly this that prompted mythicpi to double check the KH-38 seeker too
9 Likes
Use grok.ai, much more nuanced and objective in my experience. If you really have to use an AI to gather info.
1 Like
NOOOOOOOOOO
why would anyone use AI to gather information
sure it might be easier but i wouldnt trust AI in such cases
6 Likes
I’m just saying, it’s better than ChatGPT. And I don’t use AI to gather info BUT I have used it occasionally to FIND sources, if I don’t really know where to start looking.
genuine question
How so?
Is it because you can change targets mid launch?
Cause it can launch from 30km and guide from that distance, while the Kh-38MT uses a copy-paste AGM-64D sensor in-game so it’s limited to around 14km tracking range.
By the by, anyone claiming I have a photo of Kh-38MT is lying with malicious intent.
I have no photo, I’ve never had a photo, and I’ve never in my life claimed to have a photo.
Edit:
My original post seems to be missing, so I’ll add the content to this one:
There is currently no evidence of Kh-38MT existing in a functional state, either photographic or video.
I would like to see evidence of a functional missile.
I have no skin in the game for Kh-38MT being in the game or not, I will not oppose removal.
Interesting
couldnt you theoretically launch it from even further away with IOG?
(similar to the Brimstone?)
Now, that only makes the missile itself more OP, it doesn’t necessarily make the situation “amazing”, as ground RB is dynamic.
Probably, it’s hard to do testing of laser munitions for me either due to skill issue on my end or the 30km game-restriction just hating me.
Thats the thing with the laser changes, now everyone can target from 30km out (TGP and render settings permitting) in practice theres only a few weapons that can actually capitalise.
The missiles current version probably should be removed/reworked so it would be more balanced
I wounder If they changed the seeker to more like (part 1. picture where the missile only locks on around 6-8km and uses IOG to get closer)https://forum-en-cdn.warthunder.com/original/4X/f/a/7/fa717af516d18b4ff473da2647aaca5eae83029b.jpeg
Would that be enaugh for the missile to be more balanced.
