So you are saying you would be fine with its removal if replaced with something that has evidence and detailed specs?
Yes, if it’s not some dogwater missile, sure.
Arguing for manufacturing capabilities or availability to components doesn’t really further the discussion. Looking for evidence of the missiles test firing or any prototype testing is likely the only actually productive way forward, any other discussion will likely lead in circles.
1 Like
My point was the KH-38 series does not support the T variants existence as the seeker is what makes it special
1 Like
wouldn’t be the only nation with laser guided ordinance as the best option for its top cas aircraft
okay ?
Even if we had evidence of a seekers existence and its functionality it likely isn’t enough as to my knowledge the previous general threshold for implementation is functional complete prototype. (with some exceptions as usual i think)
Additionally, everyone here comparing capabilities to other things in the game also wont further things, the discussion is on the missiles existence and if current evidence should or shouldn’t be enough for implementation regardless of it’s effectiveness or lack thereof in game.
6 Likes
Kh-38ML is more than capable and can still outrange all SPAA in the game as of now. A suitable replacement for the Kh-38MT is the Kh-29TE that is proven to exist and performs well in the current meta.
1 Like
Yes, if you fire it from that far out it’s in the air forever and you are a sitting duck for planes.
there is simply not enough evidence and data for Kh-38MT to be in the game. Following the developers’ logic, each mockup can be added to the game by its very existence. E series Japanese type series heavy tanks…
So are the developers or mods following this thread? Has this issue been pushed up to anyone?
a couple mods have talked here but nothing conclusive from devs
^
Please stay on topic
2 Likes
its hard to stay on topic with how little evidence there is for its existence
Just close it then when engaging in the forum is not allowed and random posts are getting deleted while others don’t.
See the one above yours.
Yes because I am closing reported posts first, then manually the rest.
How is engaging not allowed? It’s not about the topic
3 Likes
It’s a dead end anyway, it’s not getting any better from here on.
maybe thats because nobody has found any evidence that shows MT exists
1 Like
And the circle is complete.
For the 10th time now.
If this missile is removed, will all other non existent vehicles and weaponry be removed? If yes, then go ahead, if not, that is indeed biased.
Plus at the moment the player base has no ideia on what standards/doctrine Gaijin actually is ruled by. One day one thing, other day, other thing. (not being ofensive in any way, just facts…) Would be nice for once to have clear directives of what actually is Ok or not Ok and sticking by it… For example removing Maus just for it to be brought back along with many other blatant issues, Looking at swedish heli tree…
1 Like