Its their 4zz on the line, not mine…
The Su-25sm3 has a thermal, and is a terrible CAS in top tier because it gets eaten by other jets
Yah, thing is pal, that ONE thing has completely broke top tier Ground… So there is that.
What’s ironic is that, as far as all signs point to, a Swedish Abrams is more real than Kh-38MT seeker head.
I still don’t doubt that mock-ups of Kh-38MT seeker head were made, I just doubt that it entered testing, let alone production.
5 Likes
not really, but you do you.
thats what IFs which didnt happen, so that doesnt lead anywhere
Yea now you are sitting here, complaining because nato doesn’t have the best atgm at the moment. Which can easily shift again with one of the next updates.
Yeah as the CL-13 in its time completely broke the then Top tier air and everybody got told to “cope”, so there is that…
And the Swedish Mi-28A shouldnt even exist ingame.
I knew you would say this so discount the su-25 but su-34 was fine as a platform previously even if now su-30 is preferred.
Lmao “it’s just you”, okay so I can already tell you don’t know if the missile exists.
:0
1 Like
exactly, but that is reason why gajin shouldnt allow it to happen
It sets bad precadance.
This could lead to people leaking more stuff cause apparantly gajin does use primary sources. Which will lead to gajin getting shut down at one point
1 Like
? man u do and awful job at reverse psychology, im not gonna post documents lmao
the whole swedish heli tree shouldnt exist, the apache is fictional as well
1 Like
Su-30 has a thermals, better handling, and r-77-1s
Give a Su-34 a thermal and id say it’s capable
there you go, all im saying you cannot advocate for something to be removed when theres blatant things, or everything unrealistic/not real gets deleted or not.
1 Like
Okay, so, could EVERYONE here just calm down please?
It’s getting of topic VERY often now, please keep on topic of the Kh-38MT and it’s existence or not. If you cannot provide evidence together with claims then please avoid making said claims as it will not further the discussion and only create confrontations. If anyone here sees anything that isn’t on topic that they feel the need to answer, don’t answer it in the thread, take it to direct messages.
If at any point you have personal grievances with anyone here please take it to direct messages and be respectful to each other.
18 Likes
Average forum user claiming to have “documents” on something they 100% don’t, but have to double down cus their favorite toy is in danger.
Seen your kind many times in this place, Mr. Trust me bro.
11 Likes
gajin literaly is denying mmws which is everything nato is developing right now cause its the defacto best targeting system.
We need to work at the game right now. And right now the KH38 is breaking the game and thats a fact
Ok if it does exist do you think it’s capable of tracking targets and following moving targets like it does in game?
Russia have a handful of FnF missile that use man in the loop and the LMUR as one of the newest ones can attack a target but if that target is moving the gunner needs to guide the shot.
There is footage of a Ka-52M using the missile to hit a UA target and as the missile closes in the gunner switches targets.
Personally I do not believe KH-38 IR version could track a moving target (like a Brimstone can) without Pilot input. Which is why the limited usage we have seen is the KH-38ML laser guided/GPS guided version.
im not saying i have documents aswell.
mad copium on your part.
1 Like