we currently cant even assume its exist. You guys need to prove that in the first place
the sturm literally existed and iirc was used
That’s not what we were talking about… the abrams armor is still classified, thus based on what he said, it should be removed no?
maus and the sturm existed.
Is the reload of the sturm unrealistic? yes, but both still exist not like the KH 38MT currently
Depending on how they do it, I agree
Burden of proof is to prove its existence
but we know it actualy works, we do not for the KH38mt, seriously stop trolling
The maus’s hull was the only thing that was truly together. The turret was still being made. It was only made post war by the Soviet’s if I recall correctly
but it isnt? we dont have any domestic late abrams in game because the armor is classified
we only have the export armor package for the proposed swedish abrams
Yes we do, it’s a missile and an IR seeker, tech that exists for a long time now.
that you’re all clinging to this rocket. There are enough other non-existent weapons or configurations of these weapons or settings in the game.
Very few that have the same impact on the meta tho
ok so add it with an IR seeker like stormshadow has irl
Lack of proof goes both ways
“The Kh-38MT can’t be proven to have existed and should not be in the game”
“Yeah but, like, can we actually prove any of us exist? Like, for real bro”
This is the level of the argumentation in favour of keeping the missile atm.
no it doesnt, it is literally impossible to prove non existence so it needs existence proven
I don’t care about whataboutism.
If prototype and paper tanks like maus can be in the game, so can an existing missile with an assumed seeker.
Chill tf out.
Uh no. We have SEP, and SEPV2 we just don’t have SEPV3 so I’d say we have pretty modern, and pretty accurate abrams.
What? i know it existed and exists, i cannot prove it to you. or anyone else.
we do not we have a swedish abrams with upgraded optics that gaijn calls “SEP” and “SEPv2”