2 Likes
congratulation, you found mock ups, which do not prove workability, integration and so on
1 Like
That’s not the interesting part though. I’ll leave it up to you which is which
that translates to your post being pretty much useless since u dont wanna explain apparantly
2 Likes
Sure thing man
“random guy in the internet claims A, just isnt trustworthy.” thats the issue with i said before and im pretty aware of it, and even if i post something of an answer, anyone and rightfully so, can say im making stuff up.
I also agree with you on other points, but makes no sense in removing it from the game, the solutions needs to be another one.
Aswell as said before, in the brochure there was the missile (that means nothing), but imagine that if im a factory that has propaganda about something i cant provide to potentional interested buyers due to the current… Operation… that is making me go domestic i would change to the most cost effective solution with proven results, and where my most expensive thing, the targeting pod, can be re-used and thats why theres usage in a fair volume of the KH-38ML. Overall the most cost effective solution.
" Its highly questionable to actual capability and specs the missle would have. Nobody can proof its meaned for targeted moveable tanks and not similar to the AASMR static positions. " Agreed, the mockup tho, has the IR seeker with wide lenses.
One also cannot compare the different seeker heads of the AGM-65 family, as you cannot compare the KH-29T seeker to the KH-38 seekers due to being diferent stages.
There is also another issue that i like to call, USSR/RUSSIAN Budget Engineering. The aproach to common issues is viewed in different ways and therefore solutions, less dependence on the electronic part of the thing and more hardware inclined.
This being said, you cannot prove its existence or absence.
P.S. i know my answer doesnt add something conclusive, but well… also might have english error.
2 Likes
Sadly its the best one currently.
The missile is performing to well. That with its questionability. Outperforming every spaa.
The best answer being pantsir it just ruffles everyone the wrong way.
Currently nobody can realy enjoy top one if the single main factors being this missle.
The ML variant alone will eork good enough as well.
Other nations like typhoon nations only have lasers as well. They allow fictional kh38mt to delete entire teams. But limited integration/capability MMW is to much?
They could balance it with multilasing feature if targeting pods. But right now there is no reason to keep this missle in the game
Besides that dont worry your answer is very well made
3 Likes
Despite being a Russian main… i might agree with removing, only if after, when MMW happens, the KH-38MT to be inserted again ingame…
Found a post about this image
Military innovative technopolis “ERA”. - Homing head “izdeliye 305M”; - Onboard computing platform “izdeliye 65MT”
Krasnodar region, Anapa. /Jan. 31/
9-Б-7738 was the alleged IR seeker, however was found out to be from the MTE. One of them shows a LMUR seeker, while the other a 65MT seeker. While the 65MT seeker looks similar, we cannot be certain as a forward view is needed, and it’s also weird how they just ditched the old name for it.
7 Likes
I’m really confused by the Izd 65 internal code for it the most. Is it the Kh-38?
Because I’ve seen Izd 65 being used for a MiG-21 variant and the Mil V-12
Also that onboard computer thing is the small thing next to the alleged seeker head
2 Likes
No idea. I tried searching for it, but mostly get different results. I’m not sure if it is the seeker for it, as I’m pretty sure the seeker already has a name (and this one is different), so we cannot be certain.
2 Likes
Not like Gaijin needs a proof something is real to put it in the game.
Realism is out of the question for years now.
That can actually be categorized as actual proof of existence of the IR seeker of the KH-38MT.
cough Tiger HAC cough
1 Like
not realy, because the posibilites of mock ups, it sadly does not proof workability or integration
1 Like
You don’t need much more than a mockup to have things in the game.
Agreed with what you said, but what i said is about the Seeker only.
in that regard back to an incredible stupid example i made
2 Likes
Okay and ?
mock ups being enough to get added, is a bad thing what gajins doing right now
2 Likes