It is knot da Sekret document, Comrade, it is the Sekrad dokumant. An da Ef-111 ees a pore burd ei noe.
I mean theoretically if I accuse someone of being a thief, how is he supposed to prove he never stole a thing in his life?
Some people just dont get it.
I tought this is the EN forum and not the Breton forum ))))
In that Case it’s usually innocent until proven guilty
But in Warthunder we have to provide sources for everything and anything even if it’s Only game Internal stuff like an Armor plate missing (from the damage model) or gaps in the Armor
Small correction.
We have to provide extensive documentation for some changes, others are passed based on feelings.
e.g - refusing to listen or to consider the ridiculousness of some of the challenger 2 decisions yet nerfing fix and scimitar turret transverse because someone “felt it was too high”.
Ultimately, the standards gaijin purports to adhere to are merely a fig leaf to give them cover for what they actually want to do.
7 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
And once again, something like the MTE doesnt matter.
This csn pretty much only be advertising for wxport as well.
That i can be developed for export etc.
A mock up of it doesnt mean anything.
Even if offered for export since it can only be used to gather funds as well.
That report says as well that lmur are fired from planes lol. Yeah that guy has no idea what he talking about. Not to mention the artcile kot showing of an IR version. Thats not a thermal head
It’s Easy Russian vehicle’s are nerfed by documentation and buffed by feelings
Non Russian vehicle’s are nerfed by feelings and buffed by documentation*
*Unless documentation conflicts with feelings
See manpads
Were they just used the igla documentation to hold back the Stinger and Mistral
1 Like
Just as a reminder, the following reports have been accepted for more than 8~10 months, So Gaijin have sat on them for no reason.
4 Likes
I said , i can’t find picture… just mentions .
I think i told it myself , that the thing i found shows the wrong version and quotes MT…
Anyway. I didn’t tell “the site/article is valid” etc. i said i found -this-, it mentions MT …but it doesn’t have or show anything about MT.
In general , my point was that they mention but they don’t show. Other pages , too.
I’m saying i believe it exists , because it wouldn’t be weird. What i don’t understand is why use a questionable weapon in WT , in the first place . And on the other hand they even “limit” weapons that we know they existed and how they operated “because balance” .
This i told it for the reason , someone i read said that is …extended range. Which is not.
Companies do “fish” for money /founds in the market.
Just pointing out how incredible bad the article was made.
Generaly dont post pro russian propoaganda ukrainian war articles here.
Propably has been removed for political reasons and cause it did have war pictures
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
yeah you quite literally said
which means you flew into the range of an enem,y SPAA, pretty much every map spawns you out of the range of nato SPAAs so just turn around until your at 21km turn again and you will be at about 20km and then you have 8km to kill 6 players easy
1 Like
As suggestions. It might get implemented, it might not.
By dint of having sources attached makes them suggestions, not reports regardless of their content.
It’s a mockup of KH-38ME - nothing about it being fitted with thermal seeker in it’s designation. That was my point. Can I do a funny? Please? I’m doing it…
Calling it a KH-38MT - is just a guess.
Colleague? You’re working for russian military production?
1 Like
i deleted what i said, because there is no use, i couldnt be given a direct answer and with that i cant also post here the conversation…
Well that would be the closest thing to evidence that we would have in a span of 2400+ posts. But you’re right, that wouldn’t be enough to call it real due to multiple reasons.
1 Like
it would be of no use, would result in more speculation and no results… in conclusion, the points in the post cant be proven. And in my opinion also cant be disproven…
(I will not respond to PM’s, thank you.)