The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

[noister]

sadly for kh59mk2, we would have to wait for su57 to be added

[Red_warning]

I mean typically I’m not against some degree of leeway in the the way vehicles and weapons are implemented in the game, some nations need more help than others. But Russia is not one of them, and with a weapon like this having such a repressive effect on gameplay I think Gaijin’s standards ought to be higher.

[mineLo]

This whole situation is a double standard and i do hope it gets resolved one way or another. But yes some nations, especially small ones should get more leeway (to some extent they already are, the whole F16AJ situation)

[Red_warning]

And a lot of people, perhaps a majority, are not okay with this.

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

Russia 100% needed something to keep up with others, they had no tgp or thermal sights.
If it had to be the kh38 is another question.

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Ghost_of_TelAviv

There are entire vehicles which only existed on paper and they are still in the game.

regardless, this here what we have with kh38mt is a double standard we don’t give other top tier aircraft such armament without evidence

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

Ah and it’s not double standard calling for it’s removal while other things are fine because whatever.

[coffee_can-psn]

lmao bro what, Russia was hardly suffering with kh29ts and the fact you don’t an issue with the missile currently owning ground rb being fake is frankly bizarre.

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Ghost_of_TelAviv

Ah and it’s not double standard calling for it’s removal while other things are fine because whatever.

you can make another post to call for removal of other unrealistic vehicles however if they are event/non tech tree then it isn’t equivalent. if it was equivalent then any vehicle carrying kh38mt should be non tech tree

[S-200VE_Vega]

@coffee_can-psn

lmao bro what, Russia was hardly suffering with kh29ts

they infact weren’t

[mineLo]

and there is plenty criticism surrounding them. I mean the R2Y2s which have been in the game for years will be removed in a couple days. And they wont be the only ones

[coffee_can-psn]

what are you even talking about here, what double standards state them, agm65s are garbage and you only get 2 agm130s. who else gets FAKE op missiles

[S-200VE_Vega]

if a weapon is added without proof for balance then atleast balance it correctly instead of making it op
otherwise its just as bad as if it wasn’t added or even worse

[Tim_TeaDrinker]

@MythicPi

The brochures of KTRV and Rosoboronexport are literally the only “evidence” of its potential existence, and are likely more of a sales pitch or something they planned but never completed.

Imo “a defense company wrote it down and made some drawings of it in the past” as the literal only proof of its existence is about the shakiest bit of “evidence” out there.

Sounds literally as reason why ZA-HVM was not added 🤣🤣🤣 @DevilO6

[mineLo]

am still hoping for my Rooikat SAM ;(

[coffee_can-psn]

unless you’re using the agm65g with the sap he warhead they are incredibly inconsistent against actual tanks while kh29ts have far greater range and damage.

[S-200VE_Vega]

doesn’t matter whether agm65 are garbage or not - there is no proof of sufficient evidence for kh38mt to be added into the game based on gaijin’s standards

[DevilO6]

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

@coffee_can-psn

lmao bro what, Russia was hardly suffering with kh29ts and the fact you don’t an issue with the missile currently owning ground rb being fake is frankly bizarre.

Everbody else running around with thermal tgp and ir guided weapons on very capable platforms while russia gets tv sight missiles and in less quantitie sound fair to you?

@coffee_can-psn

agm65s are garbage and you only get 2 agm130s

sounds like american skill issue

[mineLo]

even if the Kh38MT were removed, russia still has the Kh38ML. It still outranges every SAM ingame, is fast af and the only downside would be that you cant slaughter the entire team at once with your buddies.