Yes
And on the f111c not even Images and manual’s are considered a valid Source
Yes
And on the f111c not even Images and manual’s are considered a valid Source
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Ka50/ka52 situation all over
I mean ka50s are fine when it comes to missiles tho its still stupid they can kill any heli from 8km like it was nothing
Kh38mt is just another another level of laziness and point n click simulator. ALMSOT every weapon in game require atleast some skill to use, u can die with them, u have strong counters.
In kh38mt case ofc it shts on every of these things. It doesnt bring anything postivie in terms of gameplay balance. Its like legal cheating
It’s fine now, but it wasn’t
You forget the Ka50 came out in October 2019 and the ka52 in March 2020
Name any other vehicle from that period which still is considered top of the Line
We should also mention the Ka50/ka52 got alot of Nerfs over time so it was way more op at Launch while Fighting far inferior AA.
Pretty sure Only the adats exited with a range over 9km
T80bvm
We should stay on topic tho xD
June 2021 so over 1.5 year’s after the Ka50
I will say I have found one counter to the KH-38MT and ML and that is the Black Knight, the Iron Fist APS can react and shoot down the MT and ML at a distance that the blast doesnt even deal any damage.
I had a game earlier today where some guy in an Su30SM shot 3 at me and all of them were defeated and he complained in chat that an APS shouldnt be able to stop them lmao
I bet it felt good
oh yeah, I actually thought it was a KA50 at first until I checked the replay
That’s just your guess.
What’s your guess then? It’s actually really funny seeing you absolutely malding over the topic you have absolutely 0 credibility/power in. I think you should stick to ru forum.
If you have any documents confirming it was tested, you’re welcome to post them. In the absence of such, it’s reasonable to assume it wasn’t tested
You have zero authority.And write all sorts of nonsense here.Untested products are not offered for sale.
In modern Russia, no one has ever presented the test results of any weapon
Who will sell something that has never been tested before and does not know how it works.Your statements about the tests are simply absurd.
That’s not an accurate statement at all. Plenty of products are only ever shown off at trade shows in hopes of getting funding for testing and production. And if they don’t attract any buyers, fade into nothing
There are concepts and computer graphics for this, not a full-fledged rocket.
I disagree, with the modularity of the KH-38 what makes for a better pitch than taking a full up missile and doing a quick mockup for a separate seekerhead. It shows it could very quickly and easily be tested and integrated. That doesn’t mean it ever made it farther than that.
No one is denying the existence of the KH-38ML for a reason. It’s very clearly in production and service. The same cannot be said of the MT, flat out.
For the MT version, you just need to change the finder and you will get kh-38ML, kh-38MT