my lord this is off topic and moronic
ITS THE SAME VEHICLE BUT REDESIGNATED
BOTH ARE REAL CONFIGURATIONS PLEASE RESEARCH BEFORE SPOUTING RUBBISH
9 Likes
I think this is more than enough to give solid reasoning to discard most of your takes
also heres a t29 and t30. quite clearly real and in the flesh
6 Likes
now back on topic with all of ye
4 Likes
Hello all, please remember to keep on topic. Remember as well to not insult / put down other forum members.
Take personal matters and quarrels to PMs.
Thanks.
6 Likes
and that’s the point, they would make a 100% real seeker, not a fake one with nothing in front, so if the seeker is real…and the missile (propellant + explosive charge) is also real, doesn’t this prove that the kh38mt missile is real?
No, it doesn’t.
You don’t just shove parts together and hope they work. Systems integration is a long and complex process. For all we know, those photos show the seeker from a different family of missile which has been made to fit into that body. That in no way shape or form means it’s completed development or is ready for testing.
So far, noone has shown any evidence of the weapon actually being produced or test fired. By gaijin’s own standards it should be removed.
1 Like
So if I take a X-38 a rename it a KH-38MT, then MTT, then MTTT or 388MT does that mean there is now 5 missiles? No.
bro is pulling at straws rn
1 Like
T95 is just another name for it.
Neither are fake.
2 Likes
Clearly you didn’t read any past messages… but @TestandRecognise literally just asked for everyone to be on topic, that includes you.
No, but none of them are fake. And within different context they are all each correct
Anyways, to actually be on topic, since we don’t really have any more evidence for it existing, and the current view is that it doesn’t cause there’s no evidence. Do we actually think gaijin would remove it? Like assuming they’re not hiding any information we don’t know. Cause, it definitely shouldn’t be in the game, but considering how long it took them to pull the R2Y2s i’m not really expecting them to get around to this any time soon.
How are you power tripping when you aint even a mod? This is within the topic, what are you threatening me with?
1 Like
Convenient that you say they don’t exist, because they’re more than likely classified. I highly doubt it’s fake if it’s on 3 vehicles
Come back to this topic seeing 600+ replies. Scroll looking for anything showing the seeker exists with a gen2 thermal and 25x zoom.
Not surprised nothing is here.
14 Likes
Thats a major point. Where the hell did they get those stats from
11 Likes
The question I was hoping to get answered in this thread.
The unfortunate answer I am seeming to be getting.
10 Likes
Isn’t actually the contrary? There are proof of the Seeker ON the missile. Proof that Ru Gov page recognize it exist. Proof from other missile (Kh-39 Lmur) that they have the tech to create and produce IR seeker. And there its proof that At least the IR seeker of the Kh-39 lmur can track moving target (this started the whole topic). There is one vid of it tracking a BMP2 and other attacking a MRAP/Humvee at full speed. Not reason a seeker even more modern (2016-7 by info of butowski) wouldn’t be able to do so.
The only “proof” left its that if they actually used it.
In the current conflict they have use a lot of lmur (IR seeker) and Kh-38 of the ML variant (this is my guess, we don’t know what variant they had used). Usually both missile are doing same work. Sadly not source actually saying a MT/MTE attacked something… True is that Using a missile like kh-38MT against tank its a over kill specially when it cost should be even higher than lmur that is said to cost around 220k USD$. When something like a Lancet drone do the job just fine.
There is also an interview in feb(?) of this year to the CEO of the company that made these missile and in the whole interview he never talk that they need to create a IR seeker. The thing that they are working on its anti-jammer capability for these kind of missile.
If people want to know if they have use it (Kh-38MT/MTE). They should ask Fighter_bomber. The guy its very vocal and the info he posted online about Kh-39 Lmur its in line with what the CEO said that they need Anti-jammer capability on missile.
1 Like
You mean ask the guy who posted a doctored photo of an “SU-35 intercepting an F-22” then manufactured a story of what happened?
Yeah seems like a great person to ask.
9 Likes