The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

T95 is just another name for it.
Neither are fake.

2 Likes

Clearly you didn’t read any past messages… but @TestandRecognise literally just asked for everyone to be on topic, that includes you.

No, but none of them are fake. And within different context they are all each correct

Anyways, to actually be on topic, since we don’t really have any more evidence for it existing, and the current view is that it doesn’t cause there’s no evidence. Do we actually think gaijin would remove it? Like assuming they’re not hiding any information we don’t know. Cause, it definitely shouldn’t be in the game, but considering how long it took them to pull the R2Y2s i’m not really expecting them to get around to this any time soon.

How are you power tripping when you aint even a mod? This is within the topic, what are you threatening me with?

1 Like

Convenient that you say they don’t exist, because they’re more than likely classified. I highly doubt it’s fake if it’s on 3 vehicles

@TestandRecognise

Come back to this topic seeing 600+ replies. Scroll looking for anything showing the seeker exists with a gen2 thermal and 25x zoom.
Not surprised nothing is here.

13 Likes

Thats a major point. Where the hell did they get those stats from

11 Likes

The question I was hoping to get answered in this thread.

The unfortunate answer I am seeming to be getting.

2129612266

10 Likes

Isn’t actually the contrary? There are proof of the Seeker ON the missile. Proof that Ru Gov page recognize it exist. Proof from other missile (Kh-39 Lmur) that they have the tech to create and produce IR seeker. And there its proof that At least the IR seeker of the Kh-39 lmur can track moving target (this started the whole topic). There is one vid of it tracking a BMP2 and other attacking a MRAP/Humvee at full speed. Not reason a seeker even more modern (2016-7 by info of butowski) wouldn’t be able to do so.

The only “proof” left its that if they actually used it.

In the current conflict they have use a lot of lmur (IR seeker) and Kh-38 of the ML variant (this is my guess, we don’t know what variant they had used). Usually both missile are doing same work. Sadly not source actually saying a MT/MTE attacked something… True is that Using a missile like kh-38MT against tank its a over kill specially when it cost should be even higher than lmur that is said to cost around 220k USD$. When something like a Lancet drone do the job just fine.

There is also an interview in feb(?) of this year to the CEO of the company that made these missile and in the whole interview he never talk that they need to create a IR seeker. The thing that they are working on its anti-jammer capability for these kind of missile.

If people want to know if they have use it (Kh-38MT/MTE). They should ask Fighter_bomber. The guy its very vocal and the info he posted online about Kh-39 Lmur its in line with what the CEO said that they need Anti-jammer capability on missile.

1 Like

You mean ask the guy who posted a doctored photo of an “SU-35 intercepting an F-22” then manufactured a story of what happened?

Yeah seems like a great person to ask.

9 Likes

Pretty sure that pic has being manipulate for everyone at this point. I’ve see it as F-35, F-22 and Su-57.

Like i said he is very vocal. He its the one that said that LMUR its far from perfect and it can be jammed etc etc… And also you guy forget about he post about F-22 mopping the floor with Su-30sm and Su-35s?

Its like you guys only pic the part that suit you.

They’re gen 3 thermals in-game iirc…

Why? No clue, apparently russia was putting 3rd gen thermal optics on one-time use missiles instead of their ground vehicles I guess /s

3 Likes

Last I tested it i looked like a gen2 thermal.

according to datamines, kh38 resolution was buffed

1 Like

I mean can you find unclassed tech from 2023 from any nation? Not really. There is a reason for that. Operational security

I tried to give a fair and logical path to proving it’s existence through proving it’s an inert missile and not a mockup, but no conclusive evidence has been shown. I’ve given the benefit of the doubt but now unless there is conclusive evidence it is not a mockup, I think the Kh-38MT doesn’t exist as shown in WT

4 Likes

The dude posted flase verifiably propaganda. Why should I trust anything else from him?

Just confirmed, theyre 1200x800, gen 3 thermals lol

5 Likes