The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

70km when launched from 15,000 meters.

You can’t be serious.

Oh ok, since you said seeker swap when I was referring to possible mockup I thought you had it confused

1 Like

I have marked the visible edge of both, those lines cant intercept inless one is off a reflection or transparent

if you look at the image without those markings both of those new lines are still visible

Yeah, i mentionned that to be a possibility, I’d like to see them if they exist though

That’s a T95 guy

dont talk about something you know nothing about

you clearly dont understand the t28/t95 re-designations

1 Like

its a t28 youre just spouting things you know nothing on

I dont get what youre trying to convey here ngl

Pretty sure he is being sarcastic with the whole poof and t28 thing.

Sarcasm Detector

Also the thing your talking its pretty sure just reflection from the upper side of the missile. There is not way a Circuit like you said would be transparent.

looking at this image

I can see both of those arcs at the same time, if the edge of the “lens” was solid like 99.9% of lenses than that would be impossible, you wouldnt be able to see the edge of the circuit board, hence im reasonably sure the “lens” is created by the reflection of the guard rail visible in front of it in other images

1 Like

You two clearly missed the point, there is 2 tanks for a single tank, therefore one is fake.

You’re just assuming that its the Edge of the Circuit board. And don’t realize how reflective those thing are.

and your just assuming thats a lens, and dont realize how reflective those things are

IR seeker heads are set up like this most the time, the clear covering doesnt create sifficient reflections to screw with the camera just like the gap between a lens and sensor doesnt on any other kind of camera system.

its also a single use thing so the additional cost of making it look pretty is a fools errand

image

excuse the caption of the gif, this is literally the only video i know of that shows a gimbal mouted ir seeker moving

both existed at some point, so neither is fake

1 Like

image

20 Likes

It’s 1 in the same. The T95 is either fake because it’s really a T28, or the T28 is fake because it’s now a T95…

It would make more sense to say the T95 is fake, but I’d rather they remove the T28 since it’s premium.

More than one T29 exists there are 105mm examples that still exist to this day in museums.

2 Likes

I believe its a reflection caused by the exterior tinted glass cover, the only way that being reflective would effect the sensor is by reducing input so it is likely designed to be reflective to certain wavelengths as a filter to protect the sensor

1 Like