check the wording - 70 is “max launch range”, while 40km is just “launch range”
so launch range is 70km
imma bug report it
i would rather have the MT removed tbh…
its reported and accepted already
Aight remove the damn missile from the game and let’s close the topic.
4 Likes
real?
wait till you find out about this…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/cslfk0mZwH8y
1 Like
bro triple accepted for kh-38
the fact this takes 1.2 days but then we have other bug reports that haven’t been accepted for years
10 Likes
i did a bug report on the M247 hull incorrect armor and it havent been accepted yet
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2Z4YvolbAOJq
smh
1 Like
gaijin is just randomly giving stuff to random vehicles atp, and not giving other vehicles what they had.
take f5c for example which never had flares or aim9e.
su25 missing its engine armor, kfiir c10 missing DL and MAWS.
1 Like
whatever fit their interest
1 Like
every t72 has no cupola hitbox btw
1 Like
i mean, nato turret baskets arent fully modelled anyways too, the list is endless.
lets not get off topic here.
As i said multiple times they fix and not fix whatever they like.
The best you will get is that they have some sekrit documents or they think the missile existed in some way at some point and that’s enough for them to keep it. No way in hell are they going to just remove the singular thing that makes Russian CAS so powerful and gets tank rb players flocking to grind out the planes.
Being very powerful in tank rb is the whole idea about Russian top tier jets rn (and “nato” being powerful in air rb), Gaijin seems to want to keep it that way and its clear by how they are refusing to add more powerful nato cas or spaa for years now (while doing so for russia) but are fine with giving them very powerful air to air missiles and fighters.
1 Like
Wouldn’t it be easier to prove that the missile seeker was never placed on the KH38?
I don’t understand how people keep saying that the missile itself doesn’t exist, it does, it’s the KH 38
(what I mean is, the propellant + the explosive charge, they exist and are real)
The real question would then be whether the seeker was placed on these missiles? And if that’s the question, wouldn’t this photo alone prove that it is real? Because I doubt they would waste time making the cables and all the parts of the seeker just for being fake, for example like in this photo:
this look very real for me…
if they wanted a 100% mockup it would be simple to just make a part that is 100% fake (without the cables and seeker) like this one:
Spoiler
1 Like
they want people to buy it and out of those two which would you pay more attention to