This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
No.
The problem is you’re the equivalent of the kid who says his dad works at nintendo so he has super secret inside information.
1 Like
I honestly want to see the documents gaijin used to implement the missile because all the yappers in here screaming it exists have yet to post any evidence to prove its existence.
4 Likes
Oh there he goes trying to insult and being off topic once more
And who is the one who usually starts it in said threads, including this one which was quite peaceful, hmm i do wonder who it could possibly be causing the issue
Welcome to the chaotic mess that is this party. I have been observing this… mess, since it started.
All signs point to no conclusive evidence of the Kh-38MT’s existence, with no proof of anything beyond a few mock-ups, and maybe a one-off prototype seeker head (citation needed, only evidence is 2 photos), and likely never entered testing.
The same can be said for proof of it not existing tho, but with the lack of evidence for it existing, i’m rolling with it probably doesn’t exist.
12 Likes
Because I’m in opposition, and god forbid anyone doesn’t conform to your ideas.
There has been 4 photos…
Opposition to what, it was literally asking for proof of it existing or not there was literally nothing to Oppose
you will never find a photo till now with su57s main bays open other than this
when it comes to serial su57s, they keep it well hidden.
2 Likes
And I provided links talking about usage to the mods, and so on, things that were not classified. The mods can say what they will. They have an opinion, but have to follow the good old rule book too
Im rolling on the “it was a mockup for a future potential ordinance” side and that nothing actually came from it because this is 2010s russia we are talking about and we know their military capability has been overestimated for decades from ukraines unfoldings.
1 Like
Yet the mods also said there was a grand total of nothing on usage, yet you claimed that was bias, funny how that works isnt it
That’s not what I said, don’t put words in my mouth. If you can’t comprehend what I said that’s fine, if you need a finer explanation just say so.
That’s exactly what you said, when someone pointed it out to you you said they were being biased, i comprehend it perfectly
Do you know anything about how Russians show inert weapons? I think we could figure out real vs mockup based on that
2 Likes
inerts one are red on jets. all stationary ones are inert. but if their motor end is well modelled its pretty much real just changed its motor and warhead for a safe placement
something something t14 2s38 something
dont worry its toally legit guys
Do the display picture ones have the inert markings on them? If not, I think it’s safe to say they are mockups, since no one is insane enough to have live weapons on display
Very helpful thank you