Because nothing can be said of its current use in a certain conflict… because it’s against ToS
So i ask you how is it biased to say what has been said, because it really isnt
1 Like
So if all the sources that supposedly say it exists, cannot be used bc TOS, then to the game, it does not exist
1 Like
thats not what they said…
they explicitly stated that they did not show usage
1 Like
You and I agree on most things id say, but in terms of many many other weapons that truly don’t exist, 38cm, Tiger 105, maus, etc etc. this is far closer to existing than any of those.
Perhaps in a few years we can talk about those ToS forbidden things
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
they usually dont show the stuff they use, especially if its remotely related to su57
1 Like
They clearly do bc otherwise no one would know R-77M program exists. And all the clipped wing munitions for the Su-57
I only havent because I really am curious if there are sources out there
but at this point its safe to say he doesnt have any
r77m is itself the prime example. only 1 like 1 mockup ever seen. its ramjet variant was found out from some random promo video of RuAF.
And you are being biased by refusing to listen to both sides of the discussion
PHhhhh so photos? kk then add prototypes of 6th gen us aircraft. Trust me bro I saw pics
So, they do show multiple weapons for Su-57 then?
That’s also against ToS to say to block someone you know?
I’m not adding to the conversation because you don’t deem it so?
what on earth have i walked into
6 Likes
barely. as a matter of fact we havent seen pics of its main internal weapon bays yet
I’m not refusing to listen, if you go back 500 comments, I literally said ”I am fine with it being removed, if it can be proven to not exist, but I do not believe that is the case”
In fact I seem to be far more neutral than anyone else here. Except @quartas121 hes a pretty rad dude
A dumpster fire lol