Also why are you saying that I’m unbelievable mad? How is simply pointing out the laziness and stupidity of these events being “mad”. How are you supposed to fight against something you disapprove of if you dont talk about why its bad for the game? Where in my post do I ever seem as if Im mad about the vehicle.
HORRIFIC VEHICLE DETECTED!!! Next event vehicle please
If you honestly think the Obj. 292 is a bad vehicle then I got stage 4 denial. It’s TOO good for 10.0
I get that you’re trying to twist words, but you’re bad at it.
I didn’t say it’s unbelievable to be mad. I’m kind of mad too. I’m saying that it’s ridiculous to be quite this mad over an average collection of pixels in a videogame.
??? Go into a protection analysis with the dm23, or if you really want to feel stupid the M774 and please do tell me how this vehicle is “not a good tank”
Yeah. if the 292 was any other nation, it would probably be 10.7/11.0 That gun, with that pen, can 1 shot anything with absolute ease. Everything else about it kinda doesnt matter. If it was more like 20 second reload, then maybe, but 10 seconds is only 2 seconds slower than the Chally 3
Direct quote taken from you
If you have any clue how to fight T-80s, it’s the same weaspots. LFP or the drivers port. Drivers port is a guarenteed kill. It’s not bad, it’s just not that good. It’s decent.
I think a lot of the complaining and dissapointment comes from the expectation that this vehicle was going to be on the same level of special as what the ground players got with the Object 292.
Air players instead got a very mediocre and underwhelming addition, completely destroying any expectation that aircraft players would get anything remotely on the same level as the 292.
While yes, it is an Indian vehicle, it doesn’t have any special qualities that make it stand out from other planes in it’s BR bracket in the same way the 292 does against other 10.0 tanks.
ah yes really easy to shoot a drivers port the size of a nail, not to mention the 80% chance you just get volumetriced or miss due to ping.
This is objectively untrue. Anyway, I’m done with this argument.
What do you mean this is objectively untrue? you said it was an instant kill and I can disprove that easily.
Yeah, from that perspective we just went from a slightly brokenly OP and defiently unique ground tank to a C&P aircraft just with slightly different loadout.
They could have put in a little more effort and even just added a Jag with a radar.
For real. A T-80U/T-80BV with a 152mm gun alongside the best APFSDS minus ERA and thermals is clearly a bad vehicle at 10.0 guys!!! If this was Britain then the community would’ve boycotted again already 😂
Yeah, I just got one shotted and not even in a weakspot in the Chally 2 BN. people are running this in 11.7 matches without issue
Really killed its driver and engine by shooting it in its weakspot!
If you don’t want to admit you’re wrong that is fine, but don’t take the highroad and say that something is objectively untrue when you are just wrong.
It really is not hard to hit. That’s always how I kill T-80s and T-72s and T-64s and T-90s. Even at distance I kill T-80s through the drivers port. It’s really not hard to hit. The 292 is effectively a big tank destroyer. It’s played like a tank destroyer and it dies like a tank destroyer (easily).
Do you see that amount of green present within the clip? most of that is not even penetrable when actually put to test. The fact you can hit it in the drivers port (the exact weakness you used in your example) and only be able to kill the driver and the engine is absurd. When I said that “not to mention the 80% chance you just get volumetriced or miss due to ping” you flat out said I was wrong.
Yes. I did say you were wrong. Saying that the chance of being volumetriced or pinged is 80% is a lie. it absolutely does happen. Saying it is 80% is a lie.
I think you missed the part where a T-80U practically is sitting at 10.0 with the best APFSDS shell in-game. This is top tier line up worthy lmao