Il stat shame you bro, stop yapping, the OP made a very stupid post and got clowned on, the best thing he could do now is reflect on his post and get better at the game. Please stop trying to defend this kind of behaviour on the forums, its no diffrent from people who complain about Tigers and shit…
1 Like
Its alright at 6.7, br decompression is what needed, not move things up and down, OP downtiered and unplayable uptiered isnt the way.
The thing has a devastating 128mm, not good but powerful, slow reload and very sluggish, okay ish at long to long-mid range, cause the armor is harder to pen for some tanks, moving it up or down isnt the way.
1 Like
Your a little bit behind, If you continue reading you will notice i have replied to the OP suggesting that he should refrain from such posts till he earns his nuke badge, then he will know what OP is 😆
Never saw service though. If anything, they should add the 12.8cm L/66 Jagdtiger:
Skill issue
That one could be an event or BP vehicle.
You’re saying the 88 never saw service but the 128 L/66 didn’t even make it past the crayon drawing stage.
Just like their BT-7 [F32], RBT-5, BA-11, T-126, Matilda (F-96), SU-85A, SU-100Y, KV-2 (ZiS-6), KV-220, KV-122, T-34-100, T-44-100, T-44-122, TIS MA, I-185, I-29, ITP (M-1), Tu-1, Su 8, M6A2E1, & especially the Kronshtadt, Sevastopol, & Sovetsky Soyuz…Additionally, gaijin themselves gave us the precedent for adding in a 128 L/66 Jagdtiger complete with a turbine engine:
2 Likes
Real, was built in metal.
Same. Was built.
2 Likes
He means they never saw service.
They all did exist in metal, unlike the gun discussed as well as turbine engine.
2 Likes
Wow, its quite sad that anything below 70kmh can’t disable tracks and drive around the anemic jagdtiger. Whatever shall we do
5 Likes
do you actually believe this thread is what made gaijin change the jagdtiger?
This topic is for realistic ground. JT is 6.7, not 7.3.
2 Likes
Nah, 7.0 is enough. I always encounter 2 or 3 Jagdtigers vs my poor IS-2. I can 1v1 and kill it but 1v3 is impossible while everyone said it very easy to kill 3 Jagdtiger in an IS-2 face to face.
they dont use this forum for feedback
they don’t use this forum for feedback, AND one little post definitely wouldn’t be enough anyway
it is the same BR it has always been for as long as I can remember bud…
prove it has that? I don’t think this is accurate, either way they use a formula for pen values in WT that takes shell characteristics.
it does have higher pen…
1 Like
And much more HE filler.
For someone complaining about Jagdtiger nerfs, this guy doesn’t seem to know the vehicle very well lmao.
1 Like
If it was prototyped, as in, gun installed and tested, that’s fine for it to be added.
Unfortunately we simply don’t know. It’s possible that some Jagdtigers received the PaK 43, but if they did, no photographic or physical evidence of it survived WW2. Historians of the topic still debate it. Until evidence is found, it sadly doesn’t qualify for addition into WT.