Il stat shame you bro, stop yapping, the OP made a very stupid post and got clowned on, the best thing he could do now is reflect on his post and get better at the game. Please stop trying to defend this kind of behaviour on the forums, its no diffrent from people who complain about Tigers and shit…
1 Like
Its alright at 6.7, br decompression is what needed, not move things up and down, OP downtiered and unplayable uptiered isnt the way.
The thing has a devastating 128mm, not good but powerful, slow reload and very sluggish, okay ish at long to long-mid range, cause the armor is harder to pen for some tanks, moving it up or down isnt the way.
Your a little bit behind, If you continue reading you will notice i have replied to the OP suggesting that he should refrain from such posts till he earns his nuke badge, then he will know what OP is 😆
Never saw service though. If anything, they should add the 12.8cm L/66 Jagdtiger:
Skill issue
That one could be an event or BP vehicle.
You’re saying the 88 never saw service but the 128 L/66 didn’t even make it past the crayon drawing stage.
Just like their BT-7 [F32], RBT-5, BA-11, T-126, Matilda (F-96), SU-85A, SU-100Y, KV-2 (ZiS-6), KV-220, KV-122, T-34-100, T-44-100, T-44-122, TIS MA, I-185, I-29, ITP (M-1), Tu-1, Su 8, M6A2E1, & especially the Kronshtadt…Additionally, gaijin has given us the precedent for adding in a 128 L/66 Jagdtiger complete with a turbine engine:
https://i.imgur.com/zqfM3az_d.webp?maxwidth=760&fidelity=grand
Real, was built in metal.
Same. Was built.
1 Like
He means they never saw service.
They all did exist in metal, unlike the gun discussed as well as turbine engine.
2 Likes