yeah and IT CRUSH EVERYTHING BECAUSE MOST CANNOT PEN IT BEFORE IT CAN PEN YOU
YOU HAVE TO AIM FOR “a little wittle weakspot” AND IT UFP YOU AND YOU DIED
it moved up because for gameplay and balance
IS-4 was 7.3 and it crush everything
u want that too?
Again with the straw man arguments. IS4 was 7.3 when the leopard was also 7.3. Bad argument.
IS3 was 7.0 a year ago. It got moved up during the decompression when nearly everything got moved. Eve the frikn Warrior got moved, the worst 8.0 in the game. It didn’t get moved because of balance, it was just a mass br move to try to space WW2 tanks from cold war and they needed tanks to fill the gap.
What is the point of armor. If a tank a full BR under you can point and click you, you don’t have armor. they should have to aim for a weak point. Otherwise armor is meaningless. Thats the same across EVERY TANK IN THIS GAME.
T26E5 sits at 6.7 while nearly no 5.7 can pen it anywhere frontally. Most 6.0s can’t.
2 Likes
yes because leopard can pen it, no other tank with conventional round can properly pen it and even so the apds on leopard occasionally bounce on is4 ufp or nonpen
YEAH BECAUSE THATS FOR GAMEPLAY AND BALANCE
U WANT UR TANK TO BE FRICKING INVINCIBLE?
NO
GET OUT!
I can put the SAME THING with the abrams or leopard or etc and u wont understand
m44 can pen it on manlet
most tank that has 140mm pen can machine gun port it
barrel it
dont talk about british tank, they suffer
the is-3 doesnt
I think you struggle to grasp basic words. Able to pen weak points makes it… not invincible.
I understand how armor works perfectly. Effective in downteirs, making enemies aim at weak points, able to be penned by most vehicles of your own br across large sections, ineffective in any upteir. When do you think armor should be effective? From your comments, never.
M44 can pen the IS3 across the entire mantlet and roof. EVERY ARTY CAN. it has the durability of a light tank to arty.
Wait… i thought that shooting a weak point was too hard? Isn’t that your exact argument with the is3? Its only 140mm dead center, over 220mm near the edges, which is above the pen of most 5.7s. Smaller weak point than the is3.
I thought barreling the tank was too hard too? Again your argument against the is3.
1 Like
whatever u say dude, the is-3 is fine and its not moving down
u complain too much about armor, u should just go hull down
“artillery” yeah man yk that any tank can get arti on roof right, right man
u didnt even answer my arguement about abrams, which is a 10.7-12.0 tank can get penned by a reserve tank at 1.0, which mean that abrams should get move down too right
they are not moving it down, keep coping on ur armor
Do you understand what a straw man argument is? Not only is it considered in bad taste, its also an extremely weak form of argument. You seems to be very fond of it.
Most tanks don’t have roofs that are exposed to the front. With a 20mm armor plate rather than the 35-60mm of most tanks. The mantlet on the T26E5 often doesn’t splash HE into the drivers hatch due to the turret forward placement. Same with the T32 and most american heavies.
You can make your opinion, none of the points you have made have been valid though.
more valid than you
u can pen is-3 frontally on weakspot
IS-3, no, T-34-85 CAN PEN TYPE 10 FRONTALLY LFP
OR ABRAMS FRONTALLY ON THE TURRET RING
SHOULD THEY GET MOVE DOWN TO t-34-85 BR?
say and cry all you want
is-3 is NOT moving down
Ru at that br literally has nothing there except a pile of cow dung lol even as a Ru main myself I don’t even want to play them, they are so miserable that I called the suicide hotline and they put me on hold indefinitely. There are kings in that br branket, which IMO is the T29 followed by Tiger 2. IS-3 has that 4x zoom and -3 gun depression just doesn’t cut it for my playstyle, and asking me to brawl head-on with a 23 seconds reload timer? hell no. I’ll play it maybe just to collect points from getting hit via barrel-track torture lol
i mean they sure are more versatile
but asking is-3 to move down is silly
i dont want my jumbo-76 to face is3 oh wait it already face is-3
heavy are too heavily depend on armor that when they get penned they become heavily useless
well might as well not using them
Quit being childish. 7.3 russia doesn’t hold a candle to 7.3 Japan or US. Ho-Ri and T32 are both FAR better vehicles than the IS3. Japan gets the ST-A3 and Type 99 where US gets the M163 and T95. Russia gets… T44-100? Meh, not much different than the M46.
1 Like
st-a3 has no armor, type 99 is m109 but more armored, m163 is meh T-95 is. turtle slow and cupola is a fine weakspot
M46 can get penned frontally by anything at that BR, not weakspot, but the whole ufp
Ok, i’m just going to call you a troll now. You have no experinece with ANY of these vehicles you talk about. Literally none.
ST-a3 has a 6s reload with a US90. So 4 shots for every is3 shot
Type 99 has 50% more HE mass, higher velocity, double the reload, double the turret rotation. Literally no comparison.
M163 was meh at 8.0. Against props its great and you really only see ME262 and SU-9s for jets at 7.3 Both have little standoff capability.
I thought weak points were too hard? T95 weak point is much harder to hit, far less reliable, requires APHE, and has over 200mm armor base.
M46 has the same turret armor as the T44-100 and actual gun depression. Not a great tank, but neither is the T44-100.
2 Likes
Thier 7.7 is also a bunch of mediocre dogpoo that after playing the IS-4M and IS-6, I was so miserable that my dreams filed a restraining order. Only Ru thing that is bearable in that br for me is T-10A, great zoom level, 15 seconds reload and having stab although its only single plane, I was able to make it work because I can see the target better and fire very quickly thanks to the stab. Good thing is everybody else also having cow dung at 7.7, so I’ve play 8.3 instead where they don’t suck that much anymore.
1 Like
is-3 need 1 shot
at 7.3 compare to 6.3 and no it doesnt have double turret rotation, more like 60% more or so
zsu-37 at another br higher is better and can do anti tank, zsu-23 at the same br is same/better
is-3 hatch volumetric is trickier than t95 cupola, but is-3 is faster, more versatile, although ofc the reload is bad because it use is-2 gun but also the t-95 can also get overpressure by he
fair enough
im gonna buy t-80 prem next sale so i dont have to play though that hell hole
Can consider getting the T-80UM2, with headphone you can hear the direction of missiles/AGM coming in and turn your turret to intercept them, its one of the best T-80 variants ever, highly recommended for my homies.
1 Like
isnt that like a whole 100 bucks
im
thinkin buyin the UE-1