Hey guys don’t talk too much about enlisted here, because it’s off-topic, it’s better to continue the discussion privately, before a moderator give you an off-topic warning.
2 Likes
fare enough
That’s fair, but still, I want WW1 Infantry! Now that! That’ll be awesome!
2 Likes
want to go into the enlisted forems and continue there?
Too much hate comments?
Can’t. Banned on there. If you want tho, all of my old suggestions are still on there.
1 Like
No, I had a pfp with a no no symbol on it. I didn’t plan to return so I just slapped it on and went to bed and then they banned me for it. Oddly enough tho my account is still friends with one of the mods. I don’t actually think I really ever got timed out on that forum. Me and the mods were on rather good terms. Anyways back to WW1, Gaijin please add the Saint Chamond Early! 🥺
2 Likes
There’s a suggestion for the addition of more World War 1 and interwar tanks, basically expand the game so we can have more of those vehicles for for us that enjoy them. And a lot of people really like the ww1 stuff, it’s an era full of many unique vehicles.
Here’s a link to the suggestion if you want to check it out:
1 Like
I voted yes on that a while ago. I love Ghost Maxis suggestions. He even helped me on my Sd.Kfz.251/9 Ausf. D early suggestion. Great guy.
3 Likes
Love how y’all just didn’t take any of the response from the first time y’all ran this and still leave the Zepplin spawn to get camped by tanks… So fun getting shot half a second after spawning. I swear none of the DEVs play test anything.
2 Likes
I thought this was common knowledge lol. And then because they put the spawn so low they think it’s not fit to be a reward 🤣 I mean seriously?!? You finally give us the planes, but not the Zeppelin?!? The coolest thing in the event!? Stupid stuff man.
2 Likes
Neither the Mark IVs or the Mark Vs were significantly armoured.
They were made to end trench warfare, not to fight other tanks.
They were made for infantry support, breaking fortifications and barbed wire, and crossing trenches.
There’s no gameplay to this mode. It’s just Garford spam and nothing else really works. Even the St Chamond does not reliably clear the armour of the Garford so it just sits in the back and kills everything.
2 Likes
We need more Monthly WW1 decals. Like the clown one from this Monthly Decals for March!
Also notice how this Mark V is plain? Why don’t we get that?!?
4 Likes
Huh. Well then it totally makes sense!
Why, the colorful scemes of WW1 techs are very superior
No, France can get the Renault FT17, USSR already has the Garford, we don’t need copy pasted vehicles.
And who said they were just “copy-pastes”? The names are different, aren’t they? They’re historical, right? So, what’s the problem? The USSR has the Garford—sure—but you seem to forget that Germany has one too.
What about the Mark V, which France also has? Germany has a captured Mark V as well—why aren’t you complaining about that? I wonder why. And are the German-captured Garfords and Mark Vs not “clones,” then? Or are they somehow “unique”? And how, exactly? Because the German Garford uses German machine guns? Well, who’s to say that the Soviet Mark Vs couldn’t have had their machine guns replaced with Soviet ones—just like the Garford? The Germans swapped in their own machine guns of the same caliber, didn’t they? Yes. So, what’s stopping the Soviets from installing machine guns of an equivalent caliber onto their British-made Mark Vs? Besides, there’s no definitive evidence that they didn’t do this—nothing to prove they kept the original British machine guns. I highly doubt the USSR—or the White Guard of Tsarist Russia, for that matter—had the means to keep those imported British machine guns supplied with enough ammunition. They had plenty of their own machine guns and the corresponding ammo, though…
Or is it a “different story” again? Is it okay for some—like Germany—to have “clones,” but not for others? Should I remind you that Germany only has one truly unique tank—the A7V—while the other two are essentially clones? That gives Germany a total of three WWI-era tanks… compared to just one unique tank each for the USSR, France, and Britain? Let me remind you—since you seem to have forgotten—that I have at least one photograph of a captured French Saint-Chamond tank; the Germans seized it from France during WWI, renamed it, and then used it in combat against the Entente. Or should I also mention the two captured A7V tanks—one British, one French—that the Allies seized from Germany during WWI, renamed (the British, for instance, reportedly named theirs “Heidi”), and subsequently used in battle against the German Empire? It seems you’ve overlooked these facts as well, haven’t you?
So, by what logic is it acceptable for Germany to possess two captured tanks (from Britain and the USSR)—bringing their total to three—while France, the USSR, and Britain are supposedly barred from holding tanks captured from Germany or purchased from Britain? And why, for that matter, couldn’t the United States have at least one WWI-era tank acquired through export?
2 Likes
Germany has Mark IV not V.
2 Likes
I think they should delete the gaford from the german side I are just bullying chamonds,Mark V and gafords with It is literally what happend on the April fools of last year Germany bullying the triple Ent with gafords and A7V
