The F14 needs to be buffed. It being a early 4gen fighter fighting against 4.5 gen

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
61

pheinox is a paper weight

1 Like
62

just notch easiest missile in game to notch

63

aim54 is a bomber hunter missile has same explosive mass as a 250LB bomb

1 Like
64

Both F-14s underperform for sure besides IRIAF

1 Like
65

[DEV]The F-14B should be impacted by this change to IRST/EOTS

1 Like
66

It would be better off with 9M added is the point. It doesn’t make sense for it to not have it. Same with 9L for F-14A

1 Like
67

What is your sources

68

My experience? Which I trust greatly considering… my experience.It’s also just logical considering the obvious massive downsides

1 Like
69

i have f14B 1037page hand book backing up my statements

70

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

71

This is good.

So what does it underperform in.

72

well what ya wanna hear first missiles or radar ?

1 Like
73

I thought the Flight Model was underperforming.

74

no its fine

1 Like
75

I am not here to convince you? Your opinion is not worth anything? I am just saying my peace.

76

Say your thing.

I said mine that’s that.

77

ill give you a little list first

1 massive notch angles for some reason
2 aim54C is a reduced smoke variant doesnt get it
3 aim54C does use duelplane manuevering which gaijin refuses to model
4 F14B should have aim-7P but gaijin said no because datalink wouldnt work
5 F14A should have irst but doesnt as some early ones had it
6 despite being same br as things with aim-9Ms despite being confirmed to carry them
7 aim54s have a dogfight model allowing them to be used closer like sparrows

3 Likes
78

Just making sure I know you found it on the internet but please don’t post that here

79

as long as it isnt posted i can talk about it though

1 Like
80

and to be fair its alot to read so still havent read full thing