In actual gameplay, combat altitude is usually between 6000m and 8000m, and speed should not be the main criterion. In most cases, the F15C is the second batch to reach the combat position, which is obviously incomparable to the F15E.
4 Likes
For the 120c5, above 6000 meters, higher speed makes it easier to hit the target than higher altitude, that’s why I support 14.3 for the f15e and 14.0 for the f15c ge
1 Like
@Papa_Daniel
I was forced by the enemy above me to do S maneuvers toward him in an aggressive manner to avoid being hit!
Anyway… fires back after getting closer.
Su-30SM has as much kit as the F-18C does, and the F-18C is better overall.
F-15C GE offers a superior radar, superior countermeasures, superior speed, superior agility over Su-30SM.
The F-15C GE is not the F-15EX. You cannot give F-15A/C/other older aircraft more missiles just because the F-15EX has them.
Or whatever upgrade the National Guard allegedly has, but no images have been posted of.
Your posts resort to personal attacks when I haven’t made an attack against anyone.
This is about War Thunder, not us.
Top tier air RB does not care if your aircraft is the best accelerator or dogfighter in the game.
It primarily cares about positioning, and which team sticks together.
if you just want to post nonsense you can do it yourself
11 Likes
The SU35 has an upgraded fire control system and is compatible with dual R77 racks. In terms of missile racks, the two are the same.
he will shift the goalposts further without realising that a proposal to fit something if adopted into service was enough for many parts of the Yak-141
7 Likes
Yes we do have that document. Thank you for posting it for everyone else to see.
However that is a vague statement that doesn’t prove the F-15C we’re getting is part of that program, which is my personal annoyance with the document. It doesn’t prove… and that’s sad.
@Papa_Daniel
Bringing up Yak-141 is a movement of goalposts fallacy, as well as a false-equivalence fallacy.
It’s not a service vehicle [this is the reason your post is dismissed].
F-15C GE is not an in service vehicle either :)
1 Like
Answer simple question. Did Air national guard possessed F-15E or EX in 2017?
2 Likes
But they don’t believe mrml is ready, which I think is definitely a double standard
6 Likes
The question that needs to be asked is “Are we getting a National Guard F-15 for War Thunder?”
If the answer is yes:
Then the cockpit is wrong and needs to be changed to a Nation Guard F-15 cockpit.
The livery is wrong and needs to change to a National Guard livery instead of an air force one.
The weapons availability/restrictions needs to change to a National Guard specified weapons availability/restrictions.
If the answer is no:
We need to find documentation that shows these in-game F-15s have the same capabilities as the National Guard F-15s.
@Papa_Daniel
Huh… there it is, in-service.
@KMS_Bismarck
MRML is ready and on F-15EX as we speak.
As far as I know, no one said it’s not ready.
In the bug report, the developer stated that he simply gave the model an unusable
1 Like
Fair. Appreciate the clarification.
Nowadays all F-15Cs are in ANG service. So F-15C GE which is very new modification is definitely in ANG possession
2 Likes
F-15C 2040C “golden eagle” upgrade package was never pursued, thus it cannot be in service
What?
Well currently, the APG V3 radar equipped F-15C pictured in my post was part of the Air Force 67th Squadron until 2024.
Which is the livery in-game, and its cockpit is in-game in first person view.
Gaijin is at minimum painting the in-game aircraft as an Air Force aircraft.
You and I are quite literally on the same page here. We want documentation that proves information.
As far as I know, some Golden Eagles are equipped with APG63V2
Boeing’s 2040c plan is also known as the Golden Eagle
63V2 was only tested on 18 planes in 2000s.
1 Like