F-15C Golden Eagle should be able to hold more missiles

Answer simple question. Did Air national guard possessed F-15E or EX in 2017?

2 Likes

But they don’t believe mrml is ready, which I think is definitely a double standard

6 Likes

The question that needs to be asked is “Are we getting a National Guard F-15 for War Thunder?”

If the answer is yes:
Then the cockpit is wrong and needs to be changed to a Nation Guard F-15 cockpit.
The livery is wrong and needs to change to a National Guard livery instead of an air force one.
The weapons availability/restrictions needs to change to a National Guard specified weapons availability/restrictions.

If the answer is no:
We need to find documentation that shows these in-game F-15s have the same capabilities as the National Guard F-15s.

@Papa_Daniel
Huh… there it is, in-service.

@KMS_Bismarck
MRML is ready and on F-15EX as we speak.
As far as I know, no one said it’s not ready.

In the bug report, the developer stated that he simply gave the model an unusable

1 Like

Fair. Appreciate the clarification.

Nowadays all F-15Cs are in ANG service. So F-15C GE which is very new modification is definitely in ANG possession

2 Likes

F-15C 2040C “golden eagle” upgrade package was never pursued, thus it cannot be in service

What?

Well currently, the APG V3 radar equipped F-15C pictured in my post was part of the Air Force 67th Squadron until 2024.
Which is the livery in-game, and its cockpit is in-game in first person view.

Gaijin is at minimum painting the in-game aircraft as an Air Force aircraft.

You and I are quite literally on the same page here. We want documentation that proves information.

As far as I know, some Golden Eagles are equipped with APG63V2
Boeing’s 2040c plan is also known as the Golden Eagle

63V2 was only tested on 18 planes in 2000s.

1 Like

but those double pylons are very much real and are in active service with the su35. gaijin added it cus su27sm was extremely underwhelming when compared to eurofighter/rafale , followed the same with Su30sm.

Su-35S has more space between intakes. So Gaijin invented new pylon to make it able to fit on Su-30

3 Likes

Su-27SM received the twin racks before the eurofighter or rafale were added to the game

1 Like

Su-35, Su-30, and Su-27 have the same exact distance between the engine intakes.
This has been proven previously.
Su-35 has 2 feet of wingspan improvement which adds more fuel to the wings as well.

Su-35 and Su-30SM were even proven to have identical center-lines. Not similar, flat out identical down to the tail. I’ve yet to find a photograph of Su-27SM’s underside, so no conclusion there. Su-27SM is in the same situation for my research as F-15C GE is. Though I fear there will be opposite conclusions with them if I can end up finishing the research.

I have a bug report about different fire control for su35 and su30/27

1 Like

perhaps you didn’t read my message correctly, go back and check again

i think it received it right before the eft/rafale patch. but again due to bad performance.