@HondaCivici
IOG only matters against moving targets. Smoking prior to moving means it goes to the static location.
On top of that, trees block IR, they don’t block radar [currently].
And KH-38s still “suffer” the same flaws as the AGM-65D/G for locking targets as they’re all IR guided.
And yeah, that spreadsheet is what I used against your posts; that spreadsheet disproves your posts’ claims.
Well while I understand that radar guided AGM still not a thing in this game at least they should make Brimstone use IR seeker FnF as place holder (like they did to PARS3 long ago) but also able to switch to laser anytime for more accurate
Not just straight up Hellfire seekers it look dumb if it gonna be guided by just laser then at least it should have range around 30km
Haha, wanna know how many AGMs I launched at him and he intercepted? All of them.
More like “How to not be competent in Pantsir “
Been looking them up too since a leak a while ago said groms were coming.
The hypocrisy is rather palpable with such an addition, these things are more or less budget storm shadows.
What hypocrisy?
Gaijin hasn’t added ANY radar anti-tank AGMs yet to any tech tree.
How about let Britain have it first?
Cause the ground BRs don’t exist for it.
It’d have to be 13.0 MINIMUM, and likely higher.
I don’t see the problem that let Britain have radar AGM first before anyone act
like radar brimstone gonna make Britain stomp everyone in their ways alone even Sweden+Russia can’t stop them
Correct, no one would be able to stop Britain’s CAS even more except by fighter.
Guaranteed frags is not fun on a CAS platform.
People are already upset at the non-guaranteed frags of KH-38 and AGM-65.
Its not like they would be alone since the Grom has options for terminal seeker, from a radar or EO seeker, and we’ve already seen the SU-34 firing them in the trailer.
The Brimstone cant hold a candle to the Grom range wise to boot.
Su-34 is a jet, not a radar-guided anti-tank AGM with access to thermal targeting pod slaving.
I doubt that Brits stomping Russia and Sweden in WT? It can only dream even with Brimstone radar guided i’m sure it not gonna make Britain beat the S out of Sweden and Russia combined
If so then why not? let Brits main have some fun wouldn’t hurt
Plus the only ways to counter SU-25 is jet anyway why it would matter?
Yes, we are getting the Tornado Gr4, yes we already had better CAS than Germany.
However.
Germany has better tanks, better SPAA, Better helis, even better light tanks/IFVs than Britain.
So Britain vs Germany in ground is still heavily in favour for Germany as they have the decent ground line-up
IOG matters because it goes to it’s last known position (close to it). This is really helpful if the target is disabled, slow, or stationary. These are huge benefits. where as the Maverick will lose lock and start going down. It is better to have it than none.
No one is denying the KH38 has the same flaws as the Maverick in terms of it’s IR sensor and that is not what I have claimed. Again if you read the past discussions we have, then you would’ve known it’s the flight characteristics that make the Mavericks struggle.
Lying straight to my face that you read the spreadsheet is something else man. Because if you did, you would’ve noticed that:
Force Exerted:
Burn Time:
Raw Acceleration at Ignition:
Specific Impulse:
ΔV of Booster:
Force Exerted:
Burn Time:
Specific Impulse:
ΔV of Sustainer:
You’ll probaby not read that so let me explain in simple terms. The KH38 accelerates significantly faster and maintains that speed much longer than the maverick which leads to a higher total speed. this is what makes the KH38 deadly
Do you have any source tho? Because from all we know the one in the trailer was just gps guided
TBH AGM-65D is some 1980+ tech it shouldn’t be compared with 2010 tech like Kh-38 at the begin with it almost three decades gaps
The document that HondaCivici posted which cant be posted here because you know why.
Germany doesn’t have better helis.
They have a bit better MBTs, better SPAA which I don’t run in any lineups to begin with, and slightly better light tanks.
They’ll have weaker CAS, and already have weaker helis.
As much as I understand PARS’ threat, Mokopa is far more portent when used correctly.
@HondaCivici
If IOG mattered why does no one cite it for AGM-114 Hellfire despite IOG being identical?
It doesn’t.
And those paper stats still prove all my statements correct that KH-38 is more powerful… and it doesn’t matter since both are more powerful than SPAA range, and both have the same exact flaws against tanks.