This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
The issue many are having with the “paper” argument is that they are continuously removing those types of things exactly for that reason while the MT was instead added. Many things are also denied due to being “paper” so why would the MT specifically be the exception?
Many are upset at the apparent inconsistent application of requirements and rules of additions to the game.
Even if that is actually the case, there has been no proof of this presented and no one on the forum is going to take anyone’s word for it, let alone is someone’s word enough for something to be added, there has to be actual proof for that. Something i have personally yet to have seen.
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I don’t think they added anything without evidence.
There are a lot of people on the forum who can’t study Russian documents because they simply don’t know Russian.
Or talk to people who sell these products at weapons presentations in the Russian Federation like MAKS
In general, there are many conventions. But the very existence of the basic model is not in doubt. Back in 2015, military experts questioned the existence of the kh38 as such. Because there were no real shots anywhere except for models and brochures.
And that is why everyone is arguing about it, no one has been able to find any definitive evidence and Gaijin hasn’t shown any either.
There is a BIG thread on exactly this thing ( The Kh-38MT may not actually exist ) that was eventually locked due to users not being able to behave or keep on topic.
The best evidence so far is a brochure from 2024 with an image of an unknown version that might be the MT. To many that is still not solid evidence and to others it’s enough. But things have been denied for the game with more evidence than that.
And there are many that can speak Russian and have commented in the thread linked above.
6 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I give u link from GOV.RU site from russian goverment of military control.
MTE
creator of the topic says that it turns out it was at the exhibition:
Just imagine that there will be a post about weapons on the official website of the US government. And you will prove to the Americans that these weapons do not exist.
Would you be ok with the AIM-120AXE being added right now to the F-15E? We know it theoretically exists, but good luck to you trying to actually confirm anything significant about it.
Especially if it was added with say the dual mode seeker off the RIM-162 or some other BS.
4 Likes
- your stupid link doesnt even work
- the creator said that the MOCKUP is probably a MTE but its still a MOCKUP ffs
The rules are pretty clear that a weapon needs to have a working prototype for which there is simply no evidence for the KH38MT
4 Likes
Sooner or later it will be like with tanks from another game, where later they started introducing fantastic drawings from basement libraries
It also should only be added where there is direct proof of said variant being flown on a per airframe basis.
1 Like
So no implementation on the reports for the Sholef? or CV-DKs? or for any other vehicles that have the stats of accepted on the bug reports? like the ones that are for like 2 years on the wait?
Use vpn. u provider block it
E mean Export. Its mean its not mockup, this is a product
That wasn’t a no, Guess I can’t blame you for being consistent I guess. Just wish the Devs were.
They still have massive number of options (let alone specific configurations) left even at this point, they would only need to get more granular with the additions. Or go back to older designs.
With no buyers; where does the funding come from to build one?
Thats quite bad. IF there were Custom belts, and Practice rounds with reduced penetration (tho fixed damage, which is currently laughable unrealistically bad, a 57mm shell on direct hit shouldnt do a pilot slightly yellow) It would be ok-ish, as you could still throw out high performance AP rounds and make a mix for lighter targets and air targers (which also can have armor like the IL-2).
But this would on a baseline impact a bunch of guns, but not the majoriy of 20mm guns found on many more planes, which on average have 35-38mm penetration and are used far more and effecitvely, than the more rare high power, 20, 30, 37 guns and such, which even in the bad default belt, which is usually only 25-50% AP already take the SP extra, which if you have enough wouldnt use anyway.
2 Likes
who buys ICMB? No one. where does the money come from then? magic