Sadly wont last long, smin said allready that it should be corrected with the dev update
Gaijin is being really dumb with the Mossie.
Common sense isnt a usable source unfortunately
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XR7ijPegaA8a
2 Likes
If it would be just that )))))
I got that for all US Howitzer in BW service, also the reports got Hidden after that…
This isn’t true, the first 12 B Mk.XVIs came off the production line without the bulged bomb bay. All further production was finished with the bulged bomb bay.
1 Like
Where F-104 MFG tho?
4 Likes
Lmao
Why do they even require a specific source for that?
“History isn’t a source”
1 Like
Yeah…
Ju 188’s front 20mm turret gun is now an offensive gun.
I mean, if they let it use the gimball mechanic that is on the Su-24s gunpod that would be pretty cool, otherwise I don’t quite get why they would do that
8 Likes
Seeing the implementation of AShMs on so many planes, hopefully that means we can get the Sea Harrier FRS.51 and Jaguar IM soon
The early FRS.51 as a sidegrade to the early FRS.1 (Magics instead of AIM-9Ls) and the late FRS.51 as a sidegrade to the FA.2 (EL/M-2032 radar and Derby missiles instead of Blue Vixen and AIM-120s)
The Jaguar IM would just be nice to have as a late Jaguar that isn’t an event vehicle
1 Like
Yeah, i hope so too.
I am still adamant that the squadron SHar should have been the FRS.51!
1 Like
First place to start is the FRS1s and FA2
The concern Id have with the FRS51 is that its 2-4x Magic II and 2x Derby with no BOL and no engine upgrade. Making it a much weaker FA2.
Jaguar IM… maybe, though would like the Jaguar GR3A first
Are the export 64Es a WIP or is this the finalized version?
I mean, the GR3A would be cool too, but the Jaguar IM would be better
Can’t have poop in this game man…
( Why even bother putting it in the game if the only GE camo people will actually buy is the tricolor)
Bruh send that crap back to the BW email address.
I got the British name accepted using two sources, one being a similar confirmation by the Royal Artillery Museum’s curator.
Perhaps an escalation is required.
This is a long term problem and had resulted in even postwar jet aircraft carrying 1941-era GP bombs. There is complete inconsistency, implying a lack of awareness or policy, over GP, MC, and US bomb-loads on UK TT aircraft.
British GP bombs have a much lower ratio of explosive content to bomb weight than equivalent US bombs (eg. 250 lb GP vs AN-M57 250 lb), and should be replaced by MC and US bombs as soon as possible on aircraft which historically used them. In fact any aircraft equipped with British bomb lugs is capable of carrying two-lug US bombs through use of a bomb lug adapter, and the British MC bombs have both single and two-lug sides.
I understand that the differences between factions is part of the fun. I do not think that continuing to hamper the bomb loads of the WW2 and Cold War sections of the British air tree through sheer apathy is part of that.
5 Likes
Even though Bomber Mossie can destroy the base, I sense it’s geared more for Ground and Naval battles (even if you will get slaughtered in the latter) than Air battles akin to the F-117 since it can carry rockets as well
Also wondering if the regular Mossies will get a change to their secondary load outs. The Fighter Bomber variants are missing their wing bomb loadouts. The Norwegian Mossies are also missing their depth charges
I dont understand GE camos at all… Only people who have to much money and GE will buy them coz the only thing you get from camos is estetic look for your tank… Why Gaijing couldn’t just make it buyable for SL or the same way as free camos wich you get compliting 500 kills task, 700kills task ans so on…
I dont get it, but gaijing think they will earn money this way… Maybe yes, small amount…
But not that much too make more then half of camos in game (i guess around 75%) for GE…
4 Likes