The M113 is such a funny vehicle.
The US built so many of them, I’m pretty sure the list of nations that haven’t gotten their hands on one is shorter than this list of those who did.
And those who did get it, most made the same modification(and then some nations’ unique ones), and they have so many of them sitting around that they can do whatever with them.
Now that chains are moveable on the Namers, will we ever get a chance for the chains to get added to the merkavas sometime?
We put wildcat turret on them
Id love to see more M113s to begin with
Danish M113A2 MK I Wildcat
Hope we can get some weird OPFOR vismodded M113 someday
Love vismod vehicles
This is not a Vismod, it is the NGAFV (Hunter AFV hull) with a Cockerill 3105 turret, which was proposed to the US as an alternative to whatever in the MPF program.
Looks liks a Cockerill turret?
Huh, Google suggested it while looking for OPFOR vismods lol
Edit: yeah, just checked and it appears that some people were mislabeling a pic of the NGAFV as a M113 vismod
I guess the pic I found was uploaded by someone mixing it up with something like this one
Unfortunately my bug report was accepted as suggestion, which means it can take a while to be fixed if ever at all.
The funniest part is an aswer from CBR mentioning manual of MB-326K, which is most likely a manual of KC, with which my report “contradicts”. Afaik Aermacchi doesn’t share manuals for Italian MB-326k exemplars, although if they want to use export manual they could buy publicly available MB-326KD/KB manual, it at least matches performance of RS-25, unlike KC variant.
These are looking great so far!
Can’t wait to see them more widespread in the future, including rubber elements and skirts, “flappy” skirts, etc.
These things DEFINITELY have a huge impact on making the vehicles feel more lively, realistic and dynamic.
Yeah, today I learnt that the Hunter AFV (a modern M113 replacement built by Singapore) exists
snail, pls gib Update would like to test this with better hardware power on the Live ))))
I need the Hawk already yk?
Aside that many of these animations don’t interact to recoil.
Its time to listen community and revert what you want to do.
Do not change repair system in NAVAL.
91% do not like this.
You wants to ruin your gamemode ?
Yeah that was my thought exactly, its annoying they seem to be using the KC export manual as their primary source when that manual was specifically for the SA export version that had the lower power engine cause of the licence issues.
The KD/KB manual states Viper 632 as far as I am aware but I can’t double check it since its not a free manual : (
I managed to find one or 2 other authored sources as well but they are “Seconday” sources at most. What would be ideal is if someone bought the KD manual and did a new report using that and all the other sources imo.
Lets just hope they see sense and change it in the end I guess.
Oh nice, well thats good then.
I was trying to put together a list of sources last night that I knew of.
The ones I could find were,
Turbofan and Turbojet Engine Database Handbook by Elodi Roux.
Ali D’Italia MB-236
MB-326K Brochure by Aermacchi
MB-326KD/KB Flight Manual
Coccarde Tricolori Speciale - MB-326
And I expect there are some more I don’t know about but those sources alone should be more than enough to prove the engine is incorrect. Two Primary and plenty of Secondary sources in there.
