Pretty sure they carried over the progress from last dev server instead of synchronizing with live this time
It’s like that for me too
Would it be possible to add AIM-9Ls to the tech tree F-14A Early as an ordinance addition for this update? I believe it is one of the only BR 12.7s these days that lacks all-aspect IR missiles. The AIM-9Hs are very difficult to use against the competition this plane regularly faces (especially in uptiers against 13.7s), and AIM-7s are in a bit of a rough place these days. If the Early designation is holding the plane back from such an upgrade, could its model be updated to a later version of the F-14A in a future update?
We’re ignoring how the only rank iv spaa for Sweden is a derpy ass car now?
Could we get a stock BTR-82 without the missile and add on armour at 8.3?
USSR kinda needs an IFV-type light tank for their 8.3 line up, while the BMP-1 isnt up to the job and BMP-2 is 8.7, PT-7657 is hidden behind the market paywall, BTR80 is unstablised and 906 is, u know, a gun tank, not the best counter against fast moving autocannon like XM800T or Falcon
hope hawk 200 is getting more weapons needs to have its wing tip rails for the aim-9’s. it has 7 hardpoints. not 5 like the model in game currently has.
also according to the passed suggestion and other sources it should also be able to equip a 30mm gunpod.
I see the Kfir C.10 Block 60’s HMD has been changed, which is a pretty neat change.
However there is a problem, it has the same problem as the JHMCS, it lacks radar lock display without turning on the seeker missile.
A few pictures for those interested to see the change:
Another thing, I assume Gaijin is basing this off of the Targo-II HMD fitted in the Kfir Block 60, which begs the question, why is it missing the radar lock display function despite being an advanced product by Elbit Systems.
Once again, anything good that may come with an update, is inevitably paired with either a persistent issue, or a new one. I hope both the JHMCS, the DASH, and the Targo HMD systems get their correct and full symbology implementations.
That’s a lotta words but I ain’t seeing any of them saying the ROC M36 has been fixed.
As naval main, i would like to have the old imperial flag.

You forgot mentioning my bug report :(
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/rydwu70hVDut
That would be the later version, sir. Gaijin has stated that the current version in-game is the prototype (ZH200) without a radar and the old internal guns/no wingtip pylons setup as shown below:
Spoiler

Good news, however, as they stated they are adding the RDA which will have the wing pylons and a radar, but at the cost of the internal guns:
This was mentioned in the devblog, so it will be coming. It’s just not quite ready yet.

most likely because the ICV has gen3 thermals/faster/crewless turret compared to the CM-34
Fix the Ariete
Why no researchable I-Derby ER missiles for Spyder? There is no reason to keep it nerfed compared to other anti air of the same BR.
Hey @Smin1080p_WT , do you know if the Seaplane Catapult on the Nagato will get a animation for folding down?
It also seems like the spawn dircetion of the Plane is coupled to the upward facing bit of the catapult wich creates a “funny but broken” start of the Plane.
will we be able to take the cage armor off of the challenger 2 TES and OES like the TUSK on the abrams?
VLS from WW2 doesn’t exist it can’t hurt you
WW2 VLS:
Its fixed in an upcoming version.
space shuttle ahh sea plane




