It doesn’t look like those aircraft have had their damage model updated as of 2.58.0.36.
When you try to shoot at them in protection analysis, they visually take damage like they would on the live server.
You are also missing the T18B from the list, with the T18B(57) having an updated model, but the T18B does not.
You are probably also missing the M.B.175T from the list, with it being based on the same airframe as the M.B.174A-3.
@Smin1080p_WT
Can the removal of the GBU-39 SDB I from the outer wing pylons on the JAS39E be reverted. The pylons used conform to MIL-STD-1760 which are standardized connections and pinouts that allow compatibility with various US/NATO weapons without the use of bespoke harnesses. The data protocol used is MIL-STD-1553.
Otherwise you wouldn’t be able to mount none of the other GBUs on that pylon either. As a IPC certified cable technician this change to remove them does not make sense when looking at how pylons and wiring harnesses are standardized. Unless there is specific documentation stating that the outboard pylons are modified and cannot carry GBU-39s specifically, then they need to stay.
Additionally, if it is a weight concern then a full load still does not exceed individual wing loading or total payload capacity.
Any fix for Sholef’s first-stage ammo replenishment? It’s 24 or 25 sec. It has an autoloader model and a lot of ammo on it. Or increase the first-stage ammo. With a lot of bug reports.
using MITL weapons stops you from launching any other munitions, even air to air missiles. wonder if that’s going to make it to live before they fix it