In dev server placeholder like PL-12 ?
I wait gajin add AGM-84K SLAM-ER on F/A-18C (USMC) and F/A-18E Blk II (USN), but instead AGM-62 Walleye II ER/DL
Or gajin prepare open dev server again ?
unlikely the dev server version number was changed to 2.55.0.x
instead of the 2.54.0.x it was before
Sir is there any chance you or someone else could take a look at this report. They said that I did not include sources of the F-16C PoBIT but I have clearly included sources showing the upgrades to the planes one being the ALQ-213 which is apart of the PoBIT program and has to be on the plane for the MWS pylons on the plane and 360 DRWR to work. Could someone else look at this. Thank you sir.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/f4P9p6hOpICC
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/LyprLFSkpUNo
4 Likes
I can almost guarantee you the PL-12A is not changing
1 Like
and i think that it will probably never change thanks to the amazing work of the chinese bug reporters that made everyones life, bug reporting, soo much easier
one bug reporter dont lump everyone in the same pot the others are amazing
For all those hoping/ coping for a better motor for the PL-12A in particular
its not happening
1 Like
Is there any particular reason why such an important feature to the weapons operation wasnt modelled before being added?
Does anyone know what’s the range on AGM-84H?
pretty sure it maxes out at ~40km due to the seeker.
Ohk, Lower than what i was expecting but maps are not even that big. But thanks for the info!!
They don’t need to do that.
They can just add the Laser SDB, which has been missing for years at this point.
1 Like
Max is 40km for stationary targets.
Fired from any further and it will just keep flying in a direction until it runs out of guidance time.
3 Likes
Do you plan on reporting that or nah?
No, bug reporting stuff like this is just a waste of time tbh. It will just get slapped with no a bug and probably with some comment like “140km launch range != actual launch range” or something equally as stupid.
Bug reporting for this update has been such pain, about half of the reports I’ve seen have either been closed with random reasons or accepted but as a suggestion meaning it’s going straight in the bin.
10 Likes
Even if it gets accepted it would take them ages to fix it
So does this change to the AMX-30 DCA have any irl source as to why it was removed or is it just another petty attempt at Nerf the AMX-30 DCA even more?
4 Likes
It’s still wild that Gaijin seriously thinks that the J-15T deserves to be 14.7.
I can at least live with all the things that are questionable or wrong about the J-15T performance, but the 14.7 BR is just beyond criminal.
Whatever advantages this thing has over the base Su-30SM come at the cost of considerable disadvantages, so 14.3 is where it belongs.
bruh nerf wave is looking real terrible for nato countries lmaooo, stop nerfing everything in sight!
1 Like