if yall are going to nerf nato stuff so hard atleast dont be buffing russian stuff like wild, its no wonder the communities relation with gaijin is so poor
In the report made about the 35mm AA guns accuracy, the user was going off the ZA-35’s GA-35 autocannons, why does those being inaccurate translate to a huge nerf for the 35mm Oerlikon KDA cannon? this feels like they were itching to nerf nato vehicles with the smallest reasoning
Then there’s no point in adding the missiles that literally needs the LOAL in order to function. And btw, a lot of these so called “would be way too strong in-game” missiles are literally subsonic missiles that can be easily shot down
the missiles that use it are often slow, they have the problem that they may lock the wrong or no target and are still very far from the target when they lock
it would probably be a Very situational and hard to use mechanic with a High margin for error
When the officials fabricated diagrams about the JM33 round hitting the main armor of the ZTZ99A,when someone falsified data claiming the SLM travels at 2300 m/s,and when former Chinese data contributors made up the false “-2 km/h” stat for the MBT2000,I never saw anyone stand up for fairness and justice.
Yet you put all the blame on Chinese players just because of one reckless fool?
Man idc about anything this update other than the MM. Please for the love of everything just drop the BR of every Tornado IDS/strike variant by .3 or greater.
It’s actually insane that the SLE and GR4 are at a higher bloody BR than the JH7, Jaguar IS, A10C, F111F, F4S, Mirage F1C’s and especially the ADV/F3
All the 11.3/11.7 IDS variants without MAWS → 11.0
The MLU → 11.3
The Tornado IDS SLE → 11.7
Tornado GR4 reduced to 12.0 or given 2 additional 9M and left at 12.3 due to having HMD and additional BOL rails.
Remote TV guidance (dont call it LOAL) just has the problem of being spammed off airfield and just RTB. There is no risk and if allowed you will do that its all people would do.
Remember when you could guide bullpups in follow ordinance camera? On finland the FJ-4 would literally be standing on the airfield motionless and chuck them in
If the game really subscribed to that idea, we should have no standoff weapons at all. The game has moved past that point years ago. You can already do this with gps bombs.
It’s not less interactive than IR A2G missiles with LOBL at 20km. Atleast when you’re firing LOAL with GPS, you don’t know if the target will still be at the same GPS location, whereas with LOBL it’ll still keep tracking the target you fired at with no further input from the player.
And these LOAL weapons are overperforming in lock range, they’re not even supposed to do LOBL with 20km range.
Further if there’s issues from a balance standpoint then add more powerful SPAAs. The game should focus on more realism from this standpoint.
I’m not sure about others but the Agm-65 with thermal seekers are supposedly rated out to 22 km irl. Don’t quote me on it though. i don’t remember where i read that.