Its the UK, so its nearly the night :)
2 Likes
another british. amazing
i just hit 2000 kills in the black night and to celebrate i must request 1 more report on the challenger be nudged then i wont talk about it till next major i pinky promise
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/bMbEJftRqiSp
l27a1 buff plz
3 Likes
Nice! Im Almost at 2000 kills in the sep v2 i don’t know why i don’t play it more lol
One out of a bunch, but thank you! :)
1 Like
i made it a goal to hit 2k in the challenger simply because im british and proud
1 Like
Ofc np
Japan and USSR haven`t IR glide bombs
PL-12AE made its first public appearance at the 2024 Zhuhai Airshow.
2 Likes
But they have kh38mt’s which are infinitely much better
2 Likes
but they have kh38mt’s they dont need glide bombs
2 Likes
nope since you are looking at a prototype bmp iirc
Why is everyone so mean to me 💔
2 Likes
This report, and every single “source” used in it is AI generated.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/yEqs8mC6DsdH
It undermines efforts made by many of us to get vehicles and munitions changed using honest sources and legitimate information (Including the PL-12A, which many of us, including me, have made legitimate and honest reports about).
Some of the information in it is not necessarily incorrect, and comes from legitimate sources we’ve already used in reports, but is presented dishonestly and should not be tolerated.
The book used does not have any pages regarding the PL-12A; the page that supposedly talks about the PL-12A actually talks about the ABM-1 Galosh missile, as seen in the actual table of contents the reporter attached but forgot to edit. Not to mention the entire PL-12A page being blatantly AI generated, with numerous errors only AI would make, such as gibberish numbers.
The physical PL-12A placard used is also blatantly AI generated, such a placard was not present during Zhuhai Airshow 2024, only a tablet where you could choose the missile you wanted to see the specifications of (Which includes the PL-12A, and a legitimate report using a photo from this tablet has been made to change the mass of the missile already). You can also see that the background in the AI image does not match the background of the real display and has a very deformed bomb.
Thankfully, it seems the report won’t go forward without additional images from the original reporter (which they won’t provide, as it’s not real). However, I still wanted to make this post to highlight the fact that all of us (both reporters and tech mods alike) should be more wary of fake sources and AI generated content. I personally believe this report was made with malicious intent and is intentionally deceiving, but I cannot prove that, so it’s not something I will linger on.
6 Likes
Hello @Smin1080p_WT, While i do appreciate that the reports have been looked into, one response has a small error in it which is Regarding the Laser Rangefinding Range, in the response it is claimed that all Tanks have a LRF range of 10km (which is half correct) there are a few tanks that are not part of this which is the HSTV-L, RDF-LT the 2S38 with 15km. If need be i can do a report correcting my mistake with the 40km to just 15km.
1 Like
but can any one give me a clear reason why they wont add the the gbu-53 stormbreaker? like american cas isnt that good and they already added the spice 2000 and 250. so why?
1 Like
You’re right. This is the modified picture
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1Ows49qBoJAm
@Smin1080p_WT hello Smin, not my report but this report is regarding a bug, and the moderator unfortunately stated there’s no sources.
1 Like
the Kh-59 and KD-88 have the exact same issue
2 Likes