There is no reason why it shouldn’t, but be patient like the almighty master said:
3 Likes
It’s not an answer to the actual question, but until those Stormbreakers arrive you can abuse the JAGMs (if you have an AH-64E, that is)
1 Like
Are there sources for how low those missiles should cruise?
I think you put in a report for it right?
Yes, though I think the meaning behind it was lost in translation.
1 Like
How low does it cruise currently?
Datamine values says it’s hovering around ~600 meters, iirc.
1 Like
accepted issues but 2 years ago, peak of dev gaijin
1 Like
i only have a source for the base Kh-58 on hand
but it says 19 to 48 meters if i interpret it correctly
Spoiler
1 Like
I have a source for the standard deviation KDA burst dispersion being .56mils.
If burst adds about .3mils to dispersion then the 3σ dispersion for the KDA is about .8 mils
Is it worth while making a Issue report or will only single fire dispersion be considered as a reliable number for calculating max dispersion?
1 Like
Primary? Secondary?
primary
east german airforce
Su-22M4 manual to be percise
1 Like
Would love if you reported it, would be interesting to see how developers approached that as it literally would be useless without having LOAL-IR due to terrain breaking lock.
well they would probably not accept it since its not the Kh-59M
you can see the base version in the front and the Kh-59M behind it
1 Like
Honestly, it would be nice if some form of LOAL+IR was implemented for them, at least to differentiate from other AGM munitions through the terrain following.
i dont think LOAL would be a good awnser
i think MITL would be better, also for balance
bc with MITL you could only guide in a single one at the time
And they won’t accept the Mk2 source either I suppose, unless there’s sources that state what the differences are?
https://web.archive.org/web/20121015110403/http://ktrv.ru/production/68/675/803/
Oh man, I wish they would do MITL
I’m still sad about the lack of MITL on the AJ.168 (TV Martel)