i feel like the engine can prob handle it since its use to dealing with loads of projectiles and explosions going on at once tho i guess 6 cluster bombs at landing in your spawn at once mite be pushing it
I don’t really know why they even added it. When i first saw JSOW in forum I thought they would test stealth ammunition with it but then i was disappointed to learn it won’t get its reduced RCS. Honestly they should have just added GBU-53 or AGM-84 which would have actually helped in CAS.
Maybe we might get it with SEAD update, with them limiting how many cluster ammunition can be taken by both team so that it won’t completely crash the game
2 Likes
it kinda crazy we have equivalents for both of these weapons in other nations but for some reason the devs wont add them to the US, devs mite be affraid of the kinda damage an F-15E could do with a full storm breaker loadout i guess
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT With the correction of Fire rate for the 3,7 cm Flak 36 on DEV, will the ammo weight and velocity be also corrected? Or is that still open for another major?
Like for the Land and navy 3,7 cm Flak 36, 43 and 44 as well as for the navy Flak M42.
They will most likely limit F-15E to 16 GBU-53
1 Like
My opinions on some of the bug report managers aside, I have nothing but praise when it comes to Gunjob
This is a really well written answer to the issue
19 Likes
true was at least hoping they would add the agm 84 since its in the files, but who knows mite still make it into the update
And then you turn around and realize the KH-38MT is effectively in the same state, but the opposite decision with the Seeker being a mockup where the LAU-128SE shares 90% commonality with other members of the MRL Family of adapter rails, so it wouldn’t be without precedent for implementation.
Also you would think it would at least go to the DEV’s to be reviewed, instead of dropped at the first hurdle.
4 Likes
Hopefully it does
I agree with you
2 Likes
Gunjob is pretty much the one tech mod that will give an actual answer to reports. The shining example of what a tech mod should actually be like, giving a detailed answer on why a report isn’t suitable, not just slapping it with “Not a Bug” and leaving it.
8 Likes
Or GBU-53 that’s been in the files for more than a year.
4 Likes
At least it’s obvious what needs to happen for the report to be reopened.
I still think this would have been better handed off to the Dev’s (with assembled evidence provided) as an option to reduce the potential for a BR decrease should related issues arise when the F-16CM inevitably underperforms, since avoiding compression is important.
6 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT hello,can administrators response the issue about CentauroII(P) autoloader’s sound? pleaseCentauroII(P) and many vehicle wrong autoloader sound
1 Like
what the hell are u taking the screenshot with a 50’s film reel?
6 Likes
Oh my, It is actually gonna get it :D. Hopefully F-18E also gets it
Definitely not for 2 of them lol
(It does)
1 Like
It’s a little higher up in th datamine, for the E