And the ERs actually adjust to moving targets
Here we go, F/A-18E report is up.
[DEV] F/A-18E missing AGM-154A-1 JSOW
@Dontkev-psn beat me to the F/A-18C report.
[DEV] F/A-18C Missing AGM-154
8 Likes
at 2.8 to 3.0 km range you are able to evade the bullets of the gepard while guiding in the missile, most gepard players use lead indicator so its really easy to guess where the bullets will land, can also just see the bullet slowly go towards you, its not hard to dodge if you arent rushing forwards
F-16s don’t use Cs only A/A-1
I am not talking about players. I am talking about the AI in the Heli EC mode. They tend to RnG snipe you quite often as soon as you get under 3km range.
1 Like
Many players feel that bug report managers and developers are actively dismissing or provoking them rather than engaging in good faith.
There is currently no room for reasoned arguments, calculations, or logic. When developers make a decision that the community can demonstrably disprove, players are still told they must provide hard evidence of whats correct and not whats wrong, even when that evidence may not exist due to the classified or undocumented nature of the subject matter.
The issue reporting system is fundamentally broken. When developers add vehicles to the dev server in such an unfinished state, it becomes the community’s job to fix it through bug reports, but players can’t help if every piece of relevant information is either classified or doesn’t exist. If perfection isn’t achievable, then a standard of “most likely correct” needs to exist as a valid basis for reports.
Something needs to change.
Smin, Gunjob and other chads doing alot for the community and the game is put under alot of unneeded pressure due to what i believe is a outdated system
18 Likes
my bad, yes think the bots are shooting apds just to make it hard to dodge.
That def needs to change, and of course they should scale the spaa to the br of the helicopters
Hey. Nobody is being dismissed or provoked. Thats not what anyone is there to do on the CBR platform.
If you require assistance with a report, you can reach out to any Technical Moderator for assistance, or if that does not resolve the matter, myself: Who is who and Reporting Procedure
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT Hello. Are there plans to give the United States weapons of equal strength to all other nations? Why does " someone" have 16 spice-250, and the United States has had 6 cumulative mavericks all its life (although they could have given a tee where 2 high-explosive and 1 cumulative hang) and are also now giving 2 bombs again?! Although even according to the photo confirmation, the F-16 has counterparts with a large number of AGM-154s
3 Likes
Hello
New munitions are being added all the time and the US’s arsenal will continue to be expanded. As you can see just today, AGM-154A has been added for initial setup and testing.
2 Likes
Is the dev server going to be extended any more?
I just hope in the future developer time and effort can be aimed towards additions that have their place in the current CAS meta.
1 Like
First some comparison screenshots for the Blenheim… it is night and day between the old and new model:
Ah, darn, slight duplicate effort, as I already reported the elevator: Community Bug Reporting System
2 Likes
Both have been passed on for resolution.
4 Likes
Suggestions passed.
5 Likes
I wonder, in case of the F/A-18C Late, would only proft the US one or all of the C Lates because same plane?
Dev server update 2.54.0.38 ~150MB
-
small changes to the J15T (and J11 / J10) like afterburner size
-
Centauro 2 received a bunch of 5mm armor on the turret
- Dragoon turret is now 7.31mm RHAHH instead of 32mm aluminium
- some new explosion effect added to a lot of ships
- and again infantry changes
5 Likes
-1 Billion social credit score for me I guess
2 Likes
So I’m a bit confused here @Smin1080p_WT
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ODWaYlV5d6db
The book I quoted is not an Encyclopedia, it’s a collection of photographs and scans of various placards from Chinese airshows and absolutely nothing else. It’s not a book that contains detailed entries or articles on weapons with summaries gathered from multiple sources (what an Encyclopedia is), the only thing the book has is photos from airshows. I only used it to provide a clear view of the placard in my photo. You can see that the page in question is a literal scan of the placard in my photo which is a bit blurry. Even with the blur however, you can somewhat make out what the placard is saying and it’s pretty clear they are the exact same.
This book has zero text other than a table of content and the locations of these airshows and the year they took place in. It’s a photo reference book. This book contains a lot of photos from airshows that we do not have access to otherwise. (As unlike the author of the book, we don’t have the means to attend every single one of them and take so many photographs)
Not only that, but when I reported the SD-10(A)'s maximum speed using an AVIC placard and a scan of it from this book in the same fashion it was accepted (Community Bug Reporting System)
9 Likes