ok then could we get the source used to make the original turn nerf to the a/b from two years ago. gotta love that big fat double standard.
2 Likes
According to the feedback, we though that bring back hull info on the hitcam in navy need to be back in addition of the new crew system.
When your compartments are destroyed, its nearly invisible.
1 Like
The new effects are really cool. But, IMO, it need some improvement.
The explosion should change if this is HE or AP.
Then when a shell ricochet, it should not create a big splash
Same thing with them giving the Aim120 2X the guidance delay of the other fox 3s no sources needed there either.
The nerf was done with documents strategically acquired by gaijin’s creative imagination team
1 Like
This is a Feedback in overall for the naval.
Since you added missile ships with high TNT load, players are annoyed
I explain.
Those missiles are SAM, but players are using it as anti ship.
New players are bored to face those ships that requier literally 0 skill to play it.
You cannot dodge them, its a point and click and so on.
If they are near 12km, with the recent shell changes, its impossible to hit them if they constantly move.
There is littlerally 0 fun to face those ships.
I recommand to change the missile system with the actual tank AA missile system (radar only like on type 03).
And please, it will not change many thing, but PLEASE uptier need to be at 0.4 cause destroyers facing battleships is annoying too. +1.0 is to much in navy.
You can put it as a test for 3 months if you want
Then, also, please, bots are snipers … annoying too.
Moreover, can you please make a possibility to have custom sight ?
I’d like to have the first one back mixed to actual one. Was better to make shot corrections.
2 Likes
Dev server update 2.54.0.31 (~2GB)
- New more detailed internals for all F5s, Ka29 and AH6M
- New cockpit for the B24D (also for the unobtainable chinese and german versions lmao)
- AS-90 received a new internal module and an autoloader (FCS)
- New internal modules for all Arietes except Ariete (P) - (FCS and hydraulics)
- New internals, an increased reverse speed and the autoloader has been added to the Centauro 2
- A lot of new projectile models (these are only a couple)
- New loading screen - J15T
- KLJ-10A got a sea search mode
- Empty mass has been increase for F/A-18F and JAS-39D
- AMX-30B2 Brenus horsepower nerf has been reversed
- SLAM-ER received its stats and FM (refer to datamine for all the lines of code)
- YJ-83K received updated stats and is no longer placeholder (pls again refer to the datamine)
- Loads of new small caliber firearms. For some reason WW2 and post war even though Gaijin advertised the upcoming infantry mode as modern combat only (again only a small portion in this screenshot)
17 Likes
Enabled autoloader for Centauro II?
At last, some good news for a ground top tier vehicle!
1 Like
Its something. Heard that it should be way faster but its whatev. Not the first vehicle to be artificially nerfed in terms of autoloader reload rate
1 Like
R.I.P sWaTrgInf, No changes in 31
I don’t understand why they nerf it so that it’s 12.0….
Italy has no other vehicles and no lineup at all at 12.0. What is the point of it at 12.0, to uptier the 11.7 lineup for a single 12.0?
Centauro II would be a significantly more interesting addition as a 12.3-12.7, both BRs where it would actually have a lineup, if that meant it could have a 3-4 second reload instead.
1 Like
So why is there an unlisted BR increase for the F-15J(m) while the near identical F-15C & Baz(i) are staying at 13.7? The AAM-3s and a tiny weight decrease don’t seem like enough to justify it being the same BR as the F-15E/Is or am I missing something?
Oh, but it stays the same BR as the F-15C/BAZ(i)/E/I in GRB despite having ZERO guided air to ground weapons of course!
the challenger stays the same (absolute pain)
You and I know both know AAM-3/4 > AIM-120 and AIM-9M lol
1 Like
And the UHT still didnt receive the missing armament
1 Like
Still 5 s meh
AAM-4s are a fairly minor improvement over AIM-120As and the AAM-3 while better than the 9M are not a major factor at the BR (and apparently not better enough to put the J and A at different BRs), maybe with decompression I could see it sitting between the C and Es, or if they un nerfed the AAMs it would defiantly need to go up.
@Smin1080p_WT hi，there is a report issue about the sound of autoloader, but no one reporting manager happen this,please report it thanks.autoloader sound issue
@Smin1080p_WT Hello, considering it’s the last day of the DEV server could the report on the correct implementation of the PIDS pylon be nuged? At least it could be implemented in the final update.
A bug report was created providing sources that it can in fact carry both AAMs and AGMs on the PIDS pylon.
Link to the report: [DEV]PIDSU and PIDS+ pylons missing the ability to use missiles.
4 Likes