that is the exception, they add more FOV by turning the main plate to allow for over shoulder (behind the aircraft!) functionality
BUT THE MAIN SYSTEM DOESN’T NEED TO MOVE TO FUNCTION
how many times are you going to misunderstand the basic concept of AESA?
here is some more stuff to convince you: look at the radar on the F-15C golden eagle, it is AESA and does not have any way to move physically, and has the 70 degree FOV to show for it
1 Like
yeah thats literally my point i was talking about ecrs radars. it updates 200x200 fov in 0.0416 seconds which shouldnt be possible what did i say that was wrong???
yeah that is definitely wrong, you are correct on that assumption.
I think I see what you mean. How do the other gimbaled radars work in game?
It’s allegedly closer to 0.357 seconds.
I know this is kind of a stretch, but will France ever get the Alsace? Or USA the Montana? Japan the A-150? I know the existing policy is that true “paper ships” never get added since they need to be laid down, but with project ships making up more and more of top ranking ships I was just curious how far we’d take it before nailing the coffin shut on battleships and moving on, adding modern destroyers and such.
i see F-15E/EX/I/IA has fixed CM dispenser on the right hand side, a good step forward.
But the incompatibility of SNIPER TGP with CM dispensers on the left side still remains an issue. The E/EXes can take chaff CM dispenser on that side as reported in this bug report Community Bug Reporting System
devs please just add forced chaff in that side if tgp is taken, would rather have that than no CM
4 Likes
@Stona_WT will there be an update/addendum to the change log?
I see no mention of the CBU’s, for example, while in the meantime various variants have been added (so far I’ve seen and tested CBU-58, CBU-87 and BLG66 (Belouga) on various aircraft…).
= )
8 Likes
A-150 technically fits the bill as an unfinished prototype as one of the guns were built and since they weren’t used on any other IJN vessels, it counts as a unique part (though that would be a first since all vessels ingame had at least had the keel laid down).
However Montana and Alsace have been denied repeatedly. Barring potential refits/sister ships and G3 class Battlecruiser, there’s not much I can think of valid Battleships/Battlecruiser that are top of the line (plenty still missing overall).
1 Like
Will we see this cockpit in the Mi-8TB series as well? They’re basically the same helicopter from a cockpit and avionics standpoint, minus the ATGM station since the TV series uses the Falanga and TB series the Malyutka ATGMs.
The choice of battle rating is a long-awaited feature. But, I feel like there’s a problem. First, we can’t check the battle rating selection for planes we haven’t purchased. 2nd, we can’t tell from the stats whether the enemy aircraft is equipped with top-tier gear or lower-tier gear. We often make tactical decisions based on the type of aircraft the other side has. Whether the weapon equipped is ARH or SARH, there’s a big difference there. For example, what if we could make it so you can tell by adding options like ‘Late’ or ‘Early’ to the name, like with the A-10?
I mean, if you see missiles on your rwr then you know hes got arh missiles. Its best to treat all aircraft as equally scary and its also not going to show up on rwr.
…or a color code: White: same BR, yellow and red for above you, green for below you. Obviously for marker game modes only…
1 Like
Believe it will be added to the IA too?
maybe its still undecided it seems
A question. I’ve been using the Gripen and Rafale, does the MAWS dump only flares or is that my problem?
1 Like
Gaijin has refused to touch the Gripen which should dump flares for IR and Chaff for radar based threats.
It’s in accepted hell
In game it just dumps flares for both making it usesless
5 Likes
@Stona_WT I gotta ask again because only you or Smin or the devs can realistically answer this but is the Pbil M/39 supposed to say Denmark for the nation or is it supposed to be Sweden?
Right now in game it’s not even close to the Danish model in armament, design, camo, or even name.
I have bug reports up for the vehicle but it would be easier to know if the devs made a mistake with the vehicle if it is supposed to be Danish or if it was a miscommunication and the vehicle is supposed to be based on the Swedish one and not the Danish PV-10 (M39)
5 Likes
Don’t forget; the report has also been bumped at least 3 times.