ah sweet cool thank you
Can someone check if the gripen C’s new radar has updated stats or does it still have placeholder ones?
Look at the bright side at least we got a vehicle an aviation one
Ground didn’t even get anything
Anyone know if anything has changed on the dev yet?
its quite funny.
the manual 40s reload is slower than the combined time from repairing autoloader ~10-20s, the ammo rerack 13s and the actual reload 4s.
2 Likes
Any change log for dev update?
AW249 still without DIRCM and armed with only stingers and spike er? Can someone please check? I would be very gratefull.
1 Like
Haven’t checked the centauro 2p but im expecting to be something stupid like 20 seconds when it should be something like 6-8sec.
40 Seconds is insane tho, whats the t80/90 reload like?
manual reload speeds for autoloaded vehicles currently in dev:
t64, t80 & t84 24s
t90, t72 & china mbts 28s *except chinese 6.7s reload mbts = 26.8s
msc, leclerc & embt 50s. lol
type 90, 10 & pt16 40s
vt-5 15s
cv 90120 & centauro 2p 10s
boxer mgs, ct-cv & harimau 9.6s
cv 90105 6.4s.
cv105 manual reload is faster than ctcv, mgs & hari autoloaded reload. all of 4 have the same exact autoloader btw.
obj 775 6s same as normal reload, ready rack literally doesnt matter
vcc 80/60 6s
otomatic 4s
bushmaster 30mm 6s
xm803 & mbt-70 cannot be manually loaded, even tho thats the sole reason for the slower reload compared to the kpz-70.
USA wanted a autoloading system that allowed manual reloading if necessary, which resulted in a slower autoload.
most of these numbers seem very random
4 Likes
How is NE? Any the new feature BVV_D ment? Or is still under development?
Let me put it this way: They are adding a, logistical aspect to the game. What does this mean. This means, it’s going to be a bit. Then, they also have to test it. So. it’s going to be awhile
1 Like
@Stona_WT I know you’re probably busy but if you could, could you check and see if the devs meant to say Denmark for the new Landsversk M39?
Cause RN it’s just a copy and paste of the M/40 with nothing for it being danish. Yes they do look similar irl but it’s lacking a lot as seen in my reports which I am still updating
[DEV] pbil M/39 incorrect camos and visual textures Community Bug Reporting System
[DEV] incorrect gun and visual model of the M39
Community Bug Reporting System
[DEV] pbil M39 wrong name
Community Bug Reporting System
5 Likes
its the tang class USS-tang
Tang tang tang sahur
4 Likes
Does someone have a changelog for the 1st update of the dev server?
1 Like
A lot of Israeli TT players feel that adding the Greek tree was a way to add more C&P to the tree instead of adding more unique Israeli vehicles.
I personally welcome Greek tech to the tree as it should help fill some lineups quite well.
Israel arguably has the best 11.7 lineup with the addition of Greek SPAA.
I was an Israeli main but now I like to think that I don’t main any one nation.
1 Like
I have a question: is there a possibility that the F-15EX might receive the new AN/APG-82(V)X radar in the future? Not right now, but is this something you would consider?
Fire assets are rolling on camera move.
Ain’t working for naval guns.
1 Like
You just said the same thing twice
No, I did not.
The first comment states how some feel it’s just a way to add C&P and are upset.
The second comment does not mention C&P and mentions how I welcome Greek tech.
The new Leo is not C&P no matter who says it is.
They are opinions that are in direct opposition of each other.