It’s quite literally just 2 tanks. 2A4 and 2A6, and 2A4 is the only useful one.
@MS_Phantasm
Did you just learn that?
That’s the only reason I can think of to bring that up…
at least they’re not copy pasted, they’re new designs that weren’t in game
but then staying with your idea, since we can add anything in the trees, I would like a Pantsir because Russia and France are on the same continent and an Abrams because the USE and France are on the same planet.
If we start mixing all the trees the game no longer makes sense. Personally I play a lot in simulation and it’s already starting to be hell, when you play an F-16 you face F-16s, the same for the Migs-29 and the F-15. I enjoyed playing France because at least I knew which side I was in,
why is it that every time I see your PFP all I can hear is slurping sounds? Has Gaijin ever done anything you disagree with?
France already has a Pantsir equivalent.
Also welcome to war games… real militaries have to deal with seeing like-equipment during their training too.
@Richardguy
They’ve done plenty I and ten-thousands have disagreed with, and they’ve changed over 80% of what I and thousands of others correctly critiqued about.
I’ve made stupid critiques and that backfired, or I changed my mind after reflecting on said critiques.
It’s weird how whenever you watch a YouTube video criticizing War Thunder all you hear is slurping though; you should get that checked.
2 Likes
The problem is now that you’re opinion seems poorly informed and you’re just arguing for the sake of it.
Most of what you said is redundant to each other or doesn’t compare.
The Leopard 1 31105 is nowhere near the AMX-30B2.
The NF-5A is arguably the better addition compared to the F-16. It would serve best as a squadron or ge premium.
While there’s no purpose to F-16 or Leopard 2 copy paste. They’re far to redundant to be meaningful additions, which is why we’re so against them as additions.
1 Like
And it does. A Leopard adds significantly more diversity and flavour to the tree than “six Leclerc prototypes”.
3 Likes
I’m currently banging my head against my desk.
it is true that the number of Leopards and F16s in France has been constantly increasing in recent years, especially since there have been no NATO bases since 1967
4 Likes
I hate that post, but it’s correct…
We said diversity, not copy pasted vehicle, look at what was done with south africe, that was a great addition, new vehicle and they ony add one plane cause they didn’t have any other choice
3 Likes
France has Leclercs and does not have Leos, this is very much increasing diversity.
After seeing the BENELUX subtree on another topic, I don’t see the point of connecting it to the French tree.
There is only a small portion of French vehicles (air and ground), especially compared to the German equipment.
And these vehicles will not fill any gaps in the French techtree.
In my opinion, there are three 3 gaps in the French ground tech tree:
-BR 7.X for SPAA
-BR 9.X for light tanks
-BR 10.x for medium, light and SPAA tanks.
The inventory of real French equipments exists to fill these gaps.
In addition, vehicles of purely BENELUX design and use are few in number in this tree proposal.
Finally, I’m not sure that players who want this equipment first want to play the French techtree. Something tells me that some people would prefer the German nation.
Subtrees become a headache, and break the principle of techtree nation.
Either we break this nation system and we go through research via industrial or kinship between materials.
Either the “exotic” hardware is offered to everyone, until all the hardware in the world is implemented and we are able to make 193 different techtrees.
Either we offer tech trees by nation but with bridges during major political changes in the country or offer to switch nation/maker with the rank change. A bit like Israel.
5 Likes
The USA does not have a T-80, let’s add some in this case. The original idea of the trees is to have vehicles representative of their countries, and unless I am mistaken, the Leopard does not represent France at all.
And in itself adding a leopard, it’s not even about diversity, it’s not as if France didn’t have any lightly armored tank whose gameplay is based on mobility, if it had been a heavy tank or not very mobile it would have been diversity
6 Likes
You are right, the France doesnt any leopards or F16s, but something unique.
Gaijin tries to give them leopards just for escaping some issues on leclercs, fix leclercs and no any leopards, there are much enough leopards in WT.
Same, F16s are also unnecessary, Mirages armed better missiles like IR Mica, but hmmm, everyone knows, since the Mica the Fox 3 is about to introduce, so adding IR Micas to Mirages is a very good idea than these American made ones, which is more advenced and adopted in WT today.
Otherwise, there’s a much better idea than Gaijin’s, add Holland to Germany not France so that German gets what they need like f16, AH64 Apache and even one more leoprad2A6+.
6 Likes
The tree also represents whatever subtrees and similar attached nations it has. “France” is much easier to fit into the UI than “France, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, and friends”.
1 Like
Frenchs dont need any leopards
7 Likes
Here’s another thing, we don’t know what the 2A4 will look like in model.
We can assess that the 2A6 will be the Finnish model with different camos though, so that’ll be copy-paste.
I’ll reserve my judgement on the 2A4 until I see it in-game.
@NOOBRus_BiasDUMB
France also doesn’t need VB1002, but it was added cause it’s cool.
AMX-13 HOT is also cool despite being hilariously not that useful.
You’re right.
I can’t see significant difference between AMX40 BR9.7 and the first Leclerc BR11.7. 2BR it’s a huge gap.
All Leclerc are 11.7, while Leopard 2, Abrams, T80, T90 are between 10.x and 11.x.
1 Like
The best Leopard for France is inarguably the 2A4, which is the only one I’ll come close to accepting. We don’t need any other variant.
But I’m against it because it will still be the odd vehicle in it’s line ups. As France is for the most part, a fiercely independent for military production and procurement.
Additions for the sake of additions adds unnecessary bloat and weighs down the rest of the tech tree.
South Africa added a lot of cool and interesting vehicles, but they’re occupying an entire branch.
6 Likes
So be careful, I’m going to ask you an extremely tough question, in your opinion, is there more of a link between France and the Benelux or between Germany and the Benelux?
Militarily, their vehicles are of German origin and the countries collaborate with each other (a few exceptions for the plane witch are americans)
Geographically, France and Germany are both neighbors of the Benelux
Historically, although invaded by Germany during WW2, the Benelux is very close to this one
It’s true that this question would call into question my entire point of view on the matter. It’s still a Leopard