You died twice in the beginning because you were losing your positioning completely… you act as if nothing came from those missiles.
i was not counter firing in the first 3 rounds until within 10km
the missiles that killed me in both cases were fired from within 20km
Once I unlock chaff on a jet?
Pretty much every time. With the exception of the Su-27s and MiG-29s where sitting in the mountains on Afghanistan and ambushing people as they come over them just works better.
And I’m sure you played basically exclusively Flatmark or Shitnai
1 Like
So, I’m not supposed to fire my weapons below 20km then? You even tried to fight back in those first two engagements but you couldn’t, because guess what? You lost your positioning to those missiles fired from 25 miles away…
And another thing? The only way you killed me, was because I had to notch way earlier once you started firing from 25 miles away, funny how that works?
you didnt fire from 25 a single time??? why are you just straight up lying
1 Like
do you not know the difference between km and miles?
1 Like
Fired from that range ever. Single. Time.
How do you explain you were getting a launch warning so early? I wasn’t even tracking you in ACM mode, just TWS… even if I DID fire below that range, there is literally no way you would’ve been able to know, so whether you think I did or not is of little consequence.
Either way, the way you handled the test was incredibly poor, I wanted to test the AMRAAM vs Mica’s performance in high-altitude in BVR but instead you went in a Typhoon, for some reason, then proceeded to just let people join and kill us?
also your entire argument was that they can KILL people from 25miles not PRESSURE people you cannot start backpedaling now man its too fucking late
4 Likes
They can kill people multipathing or just straight up not manoeuvring, which for some reason you started arguing they couldn’t from that range, but please tell me where I said they would 100% hit on a manoeuvring target, please point it out to me :)
This doesn’t seem like I’m saying “it will 100% hit” to me
you cant just argue one thing for like an hour and then just completely switch up when ur proven wrong thats not how it works
3 Likes
Read above, again, feel free to point out where I said the AMRAAM would 100% hit a moving target
you never said anything about these long range launches to be to pressure people so no i really dont believe that this was actually your argument the whole time, i dont think someone who dosent seem to know the difference between km and miles to come up with that.
1 Like
Bruh, it’s you who started saying I argued about “an amraam would 100% hit a moving target from this distance” even though I’ve literally never said this, only that it has a better chance at hitting than the MICA due to less drag.
If that’s what we got from the test then that’s what we got from the test and it’s very relevant to BVR, if those missiles wouldn’t have put pressure on you, then you wouldn’t have been killed?
Also, the fact that you HAD to notch meant those missiles crossed that distance pretty damn easily even with you notching, see where I’m going with this?
at the ranges we were shooting at a mica would have also put pressure on you so you have really proved nothing
25ish km at high alt a mica can absolutely hit that
I literally told you to bring Micas and you didn’t…
So guess what, we won’t know.
Instead of wanting to find answers you just want to argue, which I find rather disappointing
it seems everyone EXCEPT for you already knows the answer
1 Like
Yeah, it’s time to leave him be with his delusions, you already proved him wrong and obviously started the backpedal lol
It seems that somehow everyone except you knows that the Mica loses a ridiculous amount of speed in turns… but hey, what do I know.
Not with how our little 1v1 went lmao