you cant just argue one thing for like an hour and then just completely switch up when ur proven wrong thats not how it works
3 Likes
Read above, again, feel free to point out where I said the AMRAAM would 100% hit a moving target
you never said anything about these long range launches to be to pressure people so no i really dont believe that this was actually your argument the whole time, i dont think someone who dosent seem to know the difference between km and miles to come up with that.
1 Like
Bruh, it’s you who started saying I argued about “an amraam would 100% hit a moving target from this distance” even though I’ve literally never said this, only that it has a better chance at hitting than the MICA due to less drag.
If that’s what we got from the test then that’s what we got from the test and it’s very relevant to BVR, if those missiles wouldn’t have put pressure on you, then you wouldn’t have been killed?
Also, the fact that you HAD to notch meant those missiles crossed that distance pretty damn easily even with you notching, see where I’m going with this?
at the ranges we were shooting at a mica would have also put pressure on you so you have really proved nothing
25ish km at high alt a mica can absolutely hit that
I literally told you to bring Micas and you didn’t…
So guess what, we won’t know.
Instead of wanting to find answers you just want to argue, which I find rather disappointing
it seems everyone EXCEPT for you already knows the answer
1 Like
Yeah, it’s time to leave him be with his delusions, you already proved him wrong and obviously started the backpedal lol
It seems that somehow everyone except you knows that the Mica loses a ridiculous amount of speed in turns… but hey, what do I know.
Not with how our little 1v1 went lmao
not alot evidently
1 Like
Lmao, just wanting to argue as always.
You literally changed from ‘the most deadly ARH’ to
I think this is enough to backfire your entire ‘argument’ without further explanation.
Please tell me where I said this. I’ve only said that it’s the best in BVR engagements, not the best in everything.
Not enough to ‘backfire’ my argument if you’re pulling a strawman
“meta missile” huh
1 Like
Also, you guys realise this post is about using the AMRAAM at short ranges, where I still stand by that it’s not suited for short ranges, yet for some reason you’ve all converted into a “what missile is better” throwing fest xD
The meta is space climbing in F-15Es and Typhoons, what other missile would you use?
well ur wrong so uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
3 Likes
We’re all seeing one version of 120.
So far, you’re the only one that sees the 120 as a sort of demi-god with extreme effectiveness for medium ranges, and your only argument was ‘duh missiluh is gud if you know what you are doing’.
In that case, The R-77-1 wasn’t needed, because the R-77 was good enough if you know what you’re doing. You know which missiles weren’t necessary either? ARHs for Russia, because you can kinematically compete against ARH missiles ‘if you know what you’re doing’ with the R-27ER. Look how dumbass that sounds like.
See, your entire point relies on skill, which is the ultimate argument for convenience and doesn’t answer a damn thing about other missile’s performance.
EDIT: reaction to this:
lol, lmao even. The Rafale is an unused game asset. And the Su-30 is a fake plane.
1 Like
Because for some reason a couple of you were saying that the AMRAAM wasn’t meta in a standard BVR engagement and that the Mica would match it in performance, which is just factually wrong… and again, you’re pulling another strawman saying that “you think the AMRAAM is some sort of missile Demi-god”
Like bruh, how many times am I gonna have to ask you to point it out where I said that, do you think that I think the AMRAAM is better than the Mica in short ranges? XD
It’s just you who’s looking to argue, hell I was the only one even proposing to do tests, wanting to find answers, instead you want to argue and stroke egos on a forum…