Funnily enough I was just thinking about this today and was going to ask if you had seen anything about the AIM-120 using a similar English Bias system or not.
1 Like
My man if you’re gonna try and argue, you need to get a better translator, because you’re barely speaking English as it is.
Still more than enough to hit any shot if you’re using the AMRAAM correctly.
Doesn’t matter it still modeled incorrectly
actually in most tests 120 rarely even pull 30G manuver unlike MICA that frequently pull close
to 40G
the differences between MICA and 120 is that MICA actually can pull 50G, unlike AIM-120 that cant reach 30G
stat card wont matter, ingame actual performance does
like the AIM-7E never reach past 15G in close range
but then the DF 7E-2 pull almost 23G in one of my matches
thats what makes them different despite both saying 25G on statcard
4 Likes
My guy you’re comparing apples to oranges here. The AIM-7E has like a 2 second delay before it even starts turning, and that’s after its motor has already stopped burning, so no shit it isn’t going to turn well. The amraam doesn’t suffer with any of these issues, and like I said if you’re using an AMRAAM where if you need all 30Gs of pull right then and there (such as a dogfight) you’re not using them correctly and should instead just use your AIM-9s.
1 Like
thats why u dont use statcard G pull
the MICA can instant turn and pull close to 50G to chase target that fly pass them, unlike the 120 that say 35G pull but cant even pull 30G consistently
5 Likes
Maybe read the last part of my reply again, and you’ll see why I don’t even care that it isn’t pulling 30Gs, I get consistent kills with them, if you’re not, then that’s on you.
1 Like
maybe check what you said
3 Likes
Maybe stop complaining about a missile that’s already the meta and get good?
the 120 isnt the meta
the MICA is the current meta
the new C-5 isnt very meta either
4 Likes
The Mica has literally never been the meta, that is an absolutely awful take. It can barely match the derby in range due to its stupidly high drag. If you’re getting close enough to Rafale’s where their MICAs are going to stomp you, then that’s on you, stay high and stay fast
are you serious man?
…
5 Likes
Have you been living under a rock or have you just been ignoring aaaallll of the complaints about the MICA’s lackluster range on the forums, or even on YouTube? XD
The AMRAAM is still the king of BVR, it will continue to be that way unless Gaijin decides to unnerf half the missiles in the game like the AAM-4, PL-12, MiCA etc
If that’s the case, would you gently explain us how you outperformed the EF with so good aim-120s ‘if you know what you’re doing’ in KDR with your chinese and ‘out of meta’ Mirage?
1 Like
yeah because gaijin wont fix it
i know that MICA still need it bug fixes but then Derby 80km is still statcard range
you shouldnt just take statcard range seriously
AMRAAM isnt even BVR king smh.
its king for you because you fly straight and ignoring RWR beep beep beep and die so u assumed its king of BVR
4 Likes
Because people decided to get close? Not exactly hard to figure out… if you haven’t got experience with both missiles then why are you arguing?
The fact that I’ve played these nations and actually experienced how these missiles perform, kinda says everything. The Mica has literally never matched the Aim-120 in range, not unless Gaijin fixes the TVC issue.
Please point out where I brought up the statcard range.
You better get to check my profile if your best guess is betting that i don’t have experience with MICAs.
You’re just overpraising the AIM-120s on impractical scenarios that, given your performance, you’ve found significantly less than in the Mirage.
5 Likes
you say MICA cant match Derby range
Derby “range” is 80km which is statcard range
Derby realistic range realistically is only 50km ish
which is the same range as MICA, but then gaijin put a limit on MICA range so it automatically self destruct past 50.1km
3 Likes