The BMD-4M Should Be Added as Both a Tech Tree and Premium Vehicle, Like the JA37DI and PzH 2000 - Please leave a vote

Thanks for putting in the effort with this thread. Shame it was in vain, but thanks anyway.

I understand you, but I don’t think we should fold just yet. This is not good enough.

5 Likes

That’s probably all we’re going to hear. Someone probably told the devs that a poll was held and over 800 people agreed that the BMD-4M should be in the tech tree, so they just sent Smin to quiet us down and give a cookie cutter promise of a future BMD variant for the TT.

Also, it appears people outside of the forums agree with us. Tankensteins video on the BMD-4M says that the BMD-4M should not have been a premium in the thumbnail.

9 Likes

This is a USSR vehicle. Different standards apply to us.

looks at R-77, flight models and ignored bug reports

3 Likes

Both are too low, 10.0 minimum for both due to their size and ATGMs.

disappointed

Probably one that gonna give us “Bruh” moment

1 Like

My bet is that it will be the BMD-1 and be placed around the 6.7-7.0 range, since the BMP-1 has been moved up a few times recently.

2 Likes

They’re fine where they are.

1 Like

Ehh, its done. We’re just not the players this is aimed at.

1 Like

ngl they should add the BTR-90 with the BMP-2M turret, would fit pefectly.

2 Likes

another empty promise that lets us guessing whether you mean december 2025 or ealier

and no guarantee of a tech tree bmd4m even after saying so during the bmd4 event

vague answers my beloved

4 Likes

Sure we have the BMD-1, BMD-2, and BMD-3 left but the BMD-4M is the most modern version that is actively used and produced. Making a unique vehicle like that (armed with a 100mm/30mm gun-combo) that a premium when we already have its other base version as an event vehicle is highly disappointing. This vehicle should have been a Researchable vehicle while something like a prototype of this or something similar should’ve been the premium. Taking away mainstream vehicles like this from the research line just irritates the community. The developer team could’ve even used the BMP-3 with the Bakhcha-U module prototype as a premium (as an example), stop taking away mainstream production vehicles from the research tree.

12 Likes

There should be a tech tree version with APFSDS, it’s kinda unfair that a service use vehicle is premium when the “pre-production” BMD-4 was already event…not like they could have added a million other Russian IFVs as a premium

4 Likes

Can’t wait for Gaijins response to “why haven’t you added any TT vehicles to Russia?” To be “we’re running out of vehicles” as if 1) that’s even remotely true 2) they didn’t just spend the last year throwing in random premiums nobody asked for

2 Likes

obraz

3 Likes

Update comming tomorrow. It’s over guys. Good fight

9dd5d82b0caf34cb737a9e555c1d40b0fb93aadfa59f8ffe1934ceaeb223f8ef,w400

2 Likes

Update out now and its well and truly over.

3 Likes

What variant? A BMD-2?

1 Like

BMD-4M Sinits
Ptitselov
2S42 Lotus

Maybe

Hell, even BMD-3 with Berezhok module (like on BMP-2M) in ACTUAL tech tree would be huge (even more so considering there’s passed suggestion on RU forum)

Edit: or outright BMD-4M with the same module/turret (same here - suggestion is made on RU forum and it was passed)