majority of players are not aim monsters. You are blowing this out of proportions. Not to mention that past 600-700 meters hitting weakspots on targets moving on uneven terrain is a 50/50.
Armour does matter and Russian tanks are the clearest example, as do Strv 122s.
None of those except mobility are “best key characteristics of soviet/russian based tanks” lmao
Even mobility is just above the “mid”, reload is mid again, gun handling is atrocious due to -4 depression and 4.4° max elevation speed on Aces.
So yeah, I literally have no idea what the hell are you talking about here lmao.
they might have others, probably from the Ukrainian front or the export manual.
They are saying we cannot use those, nor give them, but they clearly do.
Remember when they did an article to explain the Abrams LFP armor and used a sensible/classified image, and it’s a member of the community that pointed it out.
i’m gonna kill both fast enough if they just show their turrets or driver bill acceptor, because those are literal weakspots. shooting upper frontal part of turret even away from breeching gives you chance to wipe out gunner and gun itself and no sektri docs will ever fix it. and yeah, armor does matter, that’s why type90, type10 are so high in BR. such a weak tanks
УПМ им. В.О. ХИТРИКА and БЦКТ ‘Микротек’ are two different companies. HKChPWSH elements were never installed on the BM Oplot tank (we don’t even know what they look like in real life).
The BM Oplot tank is fitted with ХСЧКВ 34(KhSCHKV-34) elements from company БЦКТ ‘Микротек’, and completely different specifications are claimed for them.
Because Gaijin revisits vehicles after initial release only in two cases:
Additional information was provided, which we unfortunately so far don’t have.
As I mentioned Gaijin rely on the results of the domestic trials. Issue with those is that those are basically estimates, and estimates varry, unfortunately Gaijin decided to go with the lowest possible one. Furthermore the current Duplet performance matches the broshure you are using.
457 (3BM42 pen from 0 m at 90°) * 0.6 = 274, while ingame Duplet at 68° provides 279.
Like in case of Abrams - sizeble outcry, which, unfortunately, we won’t be able to make.
Oplot is not the only tank that suffers from “being abandoned” many top MBTs also have bug reports pending for years.
What are the chances that anything will ever change? In my opinion, we might as well shove these documents right down Gaijin’s throat, because it won’t change a thing anyway. I have some materials on this issue, but I don’t even see the point in posting them here, since it’s completely useless. It’s like talking to a wall
If Ukraine will be added (probably in Soviet tree or a European tree), strong emphasis on if, we will probably see a revaluation of the Oplot. I don’t think they’re interested in fixing it right now.
We are a very small minority of the player base and currently its issues only effect small amount of players. I think the technical moderators have just been instructed to not accept any reports about the armour. Even currently accepted reports have not been implemented.
Maybe if they wanna market a new tree/subtree they’ll improve its performance.
