No baseless claims are something you and other scabs do here.
R-27Er overperforming is a fact, up until recently you could even launch it in IRST mode lol. The bias was and still is real. Which reminds me. Where are all the rocket scientists posts about the R-27ER being able to be launched in IRST mode?
Not a single one. Very telling.
But the second you post something in the Aim-54 post the scabs come in mass to refute it with anything they can.
If the shoe fits, I’ll wear it. You’ve called me a scab before and it seems that’s your general opinion for any active forum member who doesn’t constantly shill to your wild opinions on western hardware… and often you hand it out to the people doing the most unbiased and factual reporting. So yeah, I’ll wear it.
Several primary sources indicate it’s performing as it should minus multipathing, so if you’ve got information that suggests it is indeed overperforming do you mind sharing it in my R-27 thread?
I’ve made an entire thread dedicated to the missile…
When it was able to be launched in IRST mode basically making it a super amraam where were your posts about that being incorrect?
Or did you conveniently forget too.
My point is you scabs have only one agenda. To make sure NATO equipment is undeforming and Russian equipment is overperforming. Its blatant and you can see it in every post you make. I can go to a Russian missile post and there wont be half the documents posted lol. Its just word of mouth. You come to a post like this where we give ample information backing up the missile underperforms and we are met with
“Thats not enough proof”
I call it as i see it too.
We scoured the manuals and ascertained that it’s not possible to do mid-course updates without a STT. I forget who, but it was reported pretty fast. Prior to it coming to live.
Let’s discuss in the relevant thread?
So basically you heard word of mouth and went with it. But Nato equipment needs the guy who made it to come and vouch for it. Gotcha.
You cant make this up lol.
are you referring to when R-27s were first added 10 months ago you could guide them in TWS/IRST with DL and switch to STT last second? because that was fixed after we found sources in the MiG-29 manual stating this wasnt possible, it was just a hard find because the initial theory (and why it was like that in the first place) was that DL could be updated in TWS like in most other missiles with DL.
Or are you talking about recently where you could fire a SARH in TWS/IRST watch it fail to hit because it wasnt getting any illumination, and not even be able to LOAL if launched like that. That was a thing with all SARHs and it was pretty useless since the missiles couldnt guide after being fired even if STT lock was gained.
Seems like youre getting mad over something long fixed or something useless
if you wish to make further claims about the R-27 I recommend the R-27 thread
Replied in the R-27 thread, if there is anything else you’d like to discuss about the Phoenix we can stay here. Elsewise let’s not derail the thread. I’ll consider any further discussion on the R-27 here an attempt to derail.
NATO tech has too many things wrong to bother wasting our time working on something else than fixing NATO stuff.
Granted at this point, like I previously mentioned, ive given up on trying to aim for realism ingame, seing as gaijin is blatantly pro-russian propaganda and anti-west
99% of the stuff you’re complaining about applies to pretty much all missiles.
What is the R27R & ER missing? Or is that the 1%?
But now IRST HMS can lock anytarget up to 25km though its says 10km. I can switch over to pd and maintain the same lock immediately and kill targets at long and close range. It’s an exploit they refuse to fix.
Not 10 months ago. its happening right now. So pretty much it’s the same exact same exploit offered. I don’t even have to use my radar whatsoever unless to launch and re lock last second.
Its so dirty and literally free braindead kills.
Exactly. But where are all the posts from the rocket scientists about it. Dont see them anywhere. Its just something they intentionally hide because they know it gives them the unfair advantage they need.
Then you come to a post like this and see the response’s and its hilarious. The scab brigade is in full force in any thread that mentions NATO equipment.
Say thank you for Russian developer bias because the R-27ER is indeed modeled to overperform and be launched in IRST mode which it can not do. Every Russian pilot that uses R-27ERs needs an exploit to get kills, an exploit the developers probably put in intentionally.
Sure dont see any proxy fuse issues on the R-27ER either. Seems it only effects NATO stuff. But where are all the rocket scientist posts about that? Cant be found.
Very telling.
Say thank you Russian bias keeps NATO missiles like the phoenix from performing correctly. I also love how your acting like the R-27 isnt the worse missile ever made IRL. “Be ThAnKfUl thiS mIsSlE WiTh a 1 OuT 30 HiT raTiO IsnT iN Game!”
Lol thats you.
what does the first mode mean?
what’s wrong with you? in our game, the reliability of the system is 100%.If there are documents refuting that the ER is not correctly designed, provide
the developers did not give an interference protection equal to 0.7 for the R-27T / ET, so it would die out of nowhere
why rockets in reality are not as good as in the game.Because there are a lot of factors.One of them is reliability, build quality and soldering.The influence of clouds, Temperature on the powder engine.Accidental mechanical damage, etc.
if you try to switch to radar lock in ACM from IRST to radar past 10km it wont lock in radar that was fixed
R27EP or any radiation homing missile in a2a use would be like shooting a SARH at a low alt target but all the time.
Not to mention it’s questionable if it was ever even used, what avionics it required, etc. Unless the sources are in Russian I can’t find any info on it beyond ‘passive radiation missile’
R-27EP definitely is in use, its operation is detailed in the 9-13S manual. Its a pretty interesting missile
because it was not exported anywhere