this is a significant buff lmao
look at how much better the thing is even at low alt
Is this only a change to the D variant?
All got buffed .
C5/D equally I think
A/B got buffed too but by a different amount, which makes sense
1 Like
C/D only got drag reduction A/B got basically a whole rework including the same drag reduction as the C/D iir
2 Likes
Why is that considered a buff? Wouldn’t a long-range ARH seeker actually be more effective the more “blind” it is?
Considering that the more “blind” the seeker is, the more it can ignore the opponent’s countermeasures and become a missile that follows DL guidance more reliably, I would actually consider even that a nerf…
After 2 years of tech mods closing and ignoring my reports, because of course some inaccurate and outdated British documents based on early design estimate and early prototypes / initial production (which later had to be redesigned due to insufficient structural strength) said otherwise …
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8neWOIwbKGAr
FLS: Luft-Luft Lenkwaffe AMRAAM Teil 2 1986-1994. Any clue on whats inside?
Just checking in again to say AIM-120 will fail you in your most dire moment of need. 🍅🍅
no need to, im facing rafales with the EF rn ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;-;
AIM-120 just got a significant buff to its agility on the dev server
1 Like
By how much?
1 Like
Try in game? Because statshark missile calc is very obviously flawed in a lot of ways
it is noticeably better (this was a C-5)
AMRAAM are now very impresive.
Crazy!
1 Like
Ok, i think this is just a bug and AMRAAMS AOA would be same in live server after update, though it kinda reminds of the time AIM-120C5 was first added, didn’t that also have similar kind of pull in dev?