KA-52 doesnt have LDIRCM
but the MI8, MI28NM, and Z10ME did get LDIRCM before 64E was added
KA-52 doesnt have LDIRCM
but the MI8, MI28NM, and Z10ME did get LDIRCM before 64E was added
Thats why I said “Before LDIRCM”
The environment before LDIRCM was already glaringly redundant
Plus theres just the fact we could get something better than the AH-64E
that is why. we don’t need another hellfire slinger at a high BR without LDIRCM, or even with.
and before you bring up the 179 SAL… it doesn’t exist. a vehicle centered around a munition with lowered capability for “balancing” reasons is not something i would like to see.
they are pretty good, but at longer ranges the higher zoom (83.7X vs 63.5X) on AH-1Z helps with target ID, and keeping the autotracking from jumping between targets clustered together
while it might not be that big of a difference I still do feel more comfortable with the optics on the 1Z
and they also do have a slightly higher minimum zoom which helps a lot if you dont have scroll bound to zoom
At it’s current configuration, it could probably go even lower to 11.3 considering the Israeli 64A can use MAW+stingers. Realistically it can go down to 11.7 without any issue.
The Apaches going down by .3 was a very good move by the devs but I don’t understand why they didn’t do the same for the viper.
Though in my opinion it should stay at 12.0 and get the JAGM-MR (SAL). It’ll be a decent competitor to the Ka52 although both are getting shafted by the advanced IR missile slingers
I just want to get a modernized AH-1Z since it would be extremely competitive (Best US heli)
The optics on the 1Z would be nice