where AGM-65 Maverick for Tornado
https://aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/bomber/tornado_ids/
Those aren’t sources.
You need actual evidence.
2 Likes
Is it feasible?
my brother in christ thats a brimstone
2 Likes
Again Brimstone, the photo´s name even says it.
3 Likes
That is a brimstone on an RAF Tornado GR.4 lol
- this is a brimstone
thats a goddamn BRITISH GR.4
the brits modified their IDS for brimstones and ALARM
2 Likes
le clueless
They would need to add the Tornado IDS because that’s with more AAMs fyi.
? what
im talking about OP how he not only mixed up the brimstone, but also the RAF markings
I don’t think he mixed up the markings
prolly just thought Tornado = Tornado
which just isn’t true
yep
AGM-65 I think was considered for the Tornados (maybe even tested, though no source yet to confirm that) but was a capability considered unnecessary for it.
Sadly, rendering the Tornado a useless strike jet for GRB. Those GBU’s won’t cut it anymore, contrails and Pantsir killed this mechanic. Its F&F or nothing.
They have fire and forget just only for the British
Fingers crossed we can just drown out pantsirs with 1200 chaff next major
1 Like
Its not just Pantsir. GBUs were a thing as we could hide at 8000m or something. Now you’ll be spotted easily tanks to contrails or simply cause you’re too low. Lock a target, align the right way, drop the bomb, holding the lock for too long. Be too evasive and your lock gets out of arc. The bombs goes nuts. Thats just not how GRB works now. Others just spam half a dozen Mavericks from long range and get multikills on open maps. Strange how Gajin sets BRs for Strike Aircraft btw… Tornado with 4x GBU-16 is just lol lol lol.
Yeah… Fingers crossed for the tornado Gr4 with 18x Brimstones soon