the 2s38 is a vehicle from 2020 that is only a prototype playing against 1980s tanks
11 Likes
Guess that means the 9.7 Japan RCV(p) should go to 11.7 as well right…
11 Likes
And? Dates means nothing for BRs. Only that vehicle capable of, the sum of strong and weak sides is matters
7 Likes
And that OTOMATIC, the SPAA, suppose to do or shares with 2S38 to warrant comparison? Unless you imply that 2S38 is also SPAA (which is it, but I bet noone would be happy if it reclassified as such). If it just to say how bad it is then it the conversation of how bad OTOMATIC is in own merit and Italy requiring a proper high tier SPAA
1 Like
You do realize if Gaijin to classify 2S38 as, rightfully so since it that it designed for, SPAA it will make it stronger by making it cheaper to spawn, right?
And how many maps which allow to exploit such “huge maneuverability”? The puddle on Poland? The river of East Europe? Maybe shores of Finland?
4 Likes
You realise that what you said is simply wrong, you would no longer be able to do exploration like SPAA and it is obvious that you are not a professional player if you don’t know how to use it properly even on water.
Edit: Comment flagged by Russian trolls who are bothered by the truth lol. If you report without a valid reason the moderators intervene lol
And how so? Please, enlighten me~ I really want to see how making it SPAA will not only dump it down/nerfing, but also how to “properly” use it on water if you such “”“professional”“” (or know such people)
2 Likes
Maybe you could show us arguments. It’s like moving PT-76 to 7.7 because it’s a mid Cold War vehicle but not a World War 2 one.
That’s the guy who argued about lowering BR of Of.40 Mk.2 because it was heavier than Leo A1A1 by 0.5 ton, lol.
3 Likes
Coming from the man who claims that 2s38 should remain at BR 10.0 🤣🤣🤣
I’m so sorry for having experience with it, unlike you :)
2 Likes
You were probably flagged for flamebaiting with wild, ridiculous claims of “propaganda”, none of which has any place on the forums. Just relax.
2 Likes
By going into the water you can easily outflank enemies in some maps and take them by surprise as in the Arctic one. Learn how to play
“Is that a tank bobbing up and down in the water over there?”
“Nah, couldn’t be, just ignore it”
3 Likes
Dude you are talking to the wrong person, it’s the Russian trolls who are angry and should relax, but it’s an impossible thing when you show them the truth they don’t want to accept.
Anyway since you asked, the funny thing is that I was reported for offensive behaviour. Towards whom? No one knows since I didn’t offend anyone lol.
As you can see the Russian trolls report when you say something true and uncomfortable for them and they try to cover up the truth, as if the warthunder community didn’t know that 2s38 at BR 10.0 is simply OP, and no point in denying this fact, only players who are not able to play they defend 2s38 at BR 10.0, that is also a fact.
It’s not the first time in this forum, that trolls report something unfairly and then moderators step in and restore the comments.
There’s no trolls here man, they’re all in your head.
4 Likes
The full option is,
This post contains content that a reasonable person would consider offensive, abusive, to be hateful conduct or a violation of our community guidelines.
Which would cover flame-baiting. Just relax, and stop accusing everyone of propaganda and being “trolls”.
edit - the bold is barely visible, but the key part there is about community guidelines.
3 Likes
“Same”, such as?.. Cmon, give me a bone, just Arctic (and in just one configuration I take) is not enough for a) calling amphibious an actual feature rather than a gimmick (and even in that case - every other amphibious vehicles should go up for that) and b) be an actual justification of BR increase
How to prove the opposite
Uh huh…
1 Like