well, youve not even spaded it.
1 Like
massively.
id move 3002 and panther D to 5.7 each. absurd capabilities for that BR
2 Likes
1 Like
russian shells feel like they pen more reliably at angles than flat on tbh.
even tho APHE was notorious for awful angle penetration, and shell shatter
Last four times I touched that KV a Churchill VII showed up and I couldn’t do jackshit to it. Turret roof? Ricochet. MG port? Nonpen. Barrel? Hit it but did no damage
im not saying this out of spite, thats just you getting filtered.
the zis 5 KV1 and churchill VII are on par quite perfectly
Why would I ever use MD-5 fuse? And I guess my Russian shells are just built worse because shots exactly like that ricochet
Look, I’ll take out my KV-1 ZIS tomorrow and I’ll record ever single shot I take on Churchills
its literally the best APHE shell as it as 50% more HE for minimal pen loss
The difference between 85mm and 96mm is a lot for 4.7
BR-350A isnt really worth it
do you also think pzgr 39 is better than pzgr on tigers for that reasoning?
no bc overpressure is actually worthwhile
lemme overpressure with MD-5 fuse and sure ill change my mind
150g of tnt gives more overpressure than 100g too.
overpressure triggers at 170g bro
do u understand how it works?
bigger death sphere no matter still superior in practical use.
I recommend going and spading that KV1 and then spading the churchill VII and then coming back to this.
bro the kv-1 is not taller than the churchill, it cannot pen the roof if both are on flat ground, so why are you looking slightly downwards at the churchill
87mm to 96mm at 4.7 is a lot more important than 153mm to 165mm at 5.7/6.0
1 Like
9mm is not a big deal when most things only have 80mm of armour, or have a weakspot of around 60mm
md8 fuse doesnt really have to aim for weakspots on most shermans you fight, md-5 does