And how does that relate to my comment about fighting autocannons?
no what?
when you say “fight autocannons” what do you mean? because i think of BTR80As and 2S38s, ect , ect
Yeah I mean those so why bring up the T-80?
It deserves such a combat rating because it’s in the USSR tree. If this tank were for the US or Israel, it would be ranked 12.0. Trust me. The Israeli Namer, which has less armor and is slower, is a great example.
because the ADATS would easily kill them. easy. so what do you mean why. i’m a bit confused
I didn’t record the moment when I tried to hit its turret, but the shell clipped some part and simply passed right through, leaving me without tracks or a barrel. Now imagine if I were in a Wolfpack? They would have destroyed me with three bullets. Sorry, but this is not balanced. As you can see, the missile launcher is impossible to penetrate with a Browning. Even though the Browning is supposed to penetrate up to 31mm of armor.
How many times do we have to tell you the TT version armor isn’t finished yet?
1 Like
Umm thats a slightly different Terminator with differently shaped turret. Its currently badly modelled with 555mm of armor everywhere so no wonder you couldnt kill him.
But in any case where you cant see the target due all these bullets hitting, you can 1. turn the NVD/Thermals off or 2. go into external view and aim thru there.
And autocannons are a bigger threat to ADATS than any MBT out there simply to volume of fire. Fighting IFVs with ADATS is a suicide.
1 Like
unless you’re smart… i see you’re point anyway now
The ones that are still not modeled properly, yeah, makes sense. Wait for dev serve to close on the final week then come back.
1 Like
The “amazing” issue with top down is they made them chemical instead of kinetic for “balance” reasons. Aka, they can’t allow RU/CN to get beat down by a weapon literally designed to counter them. That’s why they have Kontact 5 but NATO doesn’t have anti-ERA rounds.
1 Like
its not light and its not an IFV
1 Like
You are making a completely incorrect comparison. You are comparing an IFV and a BMPT, which are absolutely different types of vehicles. It’s like comparing a knife and a pistol and saying the latter is better. The task of an IFV is to support infantry, while the task of a BMPT is to support tanks. Do you sense the difference? Naturally, the former will be inferior in combat capabilities to the latter.
1 Like
BMP-2M also needs to be a higher B.R.
Same as 2S38 bc that thing is broken.
1 Like
It’s armor really isnt that good, it has a HUGE gap in the turret ring where you can pen and kill all turret crew and kill the tank. (The BMPT-72 literally has a big flat “shoot me!” square in the middle of the turret)
I think 10.7 would be an okay increase, but otherwise it really wont be that good. Its limited to 4x ATGMs and the gun is pretty much null unless it gets APFSDS.
you know where you shot in the turret. its the same armor as the front armor.
would you shoot a T series tank front armor ???
why would you do that.
its not normal
The closest real-world equivalent in terms of missions.
25mm cannon
TOW anti-tank missiles
High mobility and protection
Also “covers” tanks.
And they both perform the same role. The Bradley, however, lacks LVS, armor, and normal ATGMs, while the Terminator does. And they’re practically at the same BR.
Okay, who’s going to get the most kills? The one who stands and waits at the respawn, or the one who can take a hit and carry a lot of firepower on the move?